|
Page 2 |
|
New Items will be added to the top and run off the end into archive
| IASA
Asks For Specific Wiring Specs The announcement yesterday that
AMR, parent of American Airlines would spend $1.7 billion to buy TWA
and some assets of UAL's United Airlines, in deals to give it a
quarter
of the U.S. air travel market received a "cautionary" welcome
from the International Aviation Safety Association (IASA).
polymide wire. Studies
have shown that that a crack exposing a Kapton wire's conductor can lead
to a more severe reaction when it short-circuits than other types of
wire. The continued use of Kapton insulated wire was banned by the US
Navy in 1987 -- and is no longer used in military aircraft in the United
States and Australia. In 1999, the entire space shuttle fleet was
grounded due to problems experienced with wiring on its spacecraft. |
||
| "Federal safety investigators want the Federal
Aviation Administration to shorten the time it has given airlines to
correct a potentially dangerous heater problem on certain jetliners.
They say the problem could result in fires on MD-80 and MD-90 series
aircraft and on DC-9 jetliners.
Last spring, after two fires on Delta Air Lines jets, the FAA gave airlines five years to inspect some 642 aircraft and to replace all metalized Mylar-covered insulation. But in a letter this week to the FAA, the National Transportation Safety Board said the insulation blankets should be replaced "at the earliest maintenance opportunity." "Given the fire hazard posed by metalized Mylar-covered insulation blankets ... the safety Board is concerned that the five-year-compliance period is too long," NTSB acting Chairman Carol Carmody wrote in a letter to the FAA. While the FAA order applies to all of the insulation in the affected aircraft, the NTSB recommendation applies only to insulation nearest the heaters, a factor that could influence the FAA to look favorably upon the recommendation. "I don't know what impact that (moving up the timetable) would have," FAA spokesman Les Dorr said. "It might prove that this would prove feasible, but I just can't speculate." The FAA has 90 days to formally respond to the NTSB's recommendation. The potential hazard came to light on September 17, 1999, when a fire erupted during flight in the cargo compartment of a Delta MD-88. The crew declared an emergency and landed at Northern Kentucky International Airport, from which it had just departed. Delta inspectors focused on the heaters used to keep ice from building up on air pressure measuring devices. They concluded that sharp bends in the heater elements could concentrate the heat and eventually burn the Mylar-covered insulation blankets around the heaters. Delta inspected all 136 of its MD-88s and MD-90s and determined that 11 percent of the airplanes had some type of damage to their heaters. On January 3, 2000, after the removal of the metalized insulation blankets, another heater malfunctioned on a Delta MD-88 after takeoff from Columbia, South Carolina. After the plane returned safely, inspectors found damage from electrical arcing, but the damage was contained to the heater itself. "The risk of fire is very low in any event," Dorr said. "And we think that the order that we finalized in May was a prudent action with an acceptable level of safety." But he added the FAA will look carefully at the NTSB recommendation."
|
||
|
Friday March 2, 2:21 pm Eastern Time US FAA mulls in-flight entertainment system fixes WASHINGTON, March 2 (Reuters) - U.S. aviation regulators on Friday proposed ordering airlines to improve the safety of in-flight entertainment systems by ensuring the flight crew can cut power to them in an emergency. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said an extensive review of current in-flight entertainment systems fitted as aftermarket modifications showed they could remain powered despite efforts to isolate them by the crew. ``The actions specified by these proposed orders are intended to assure the crew's ability to remove power from the entertainment system during unusual or emergency situations,'' the FAA said in a statement. Airlines would have 18 months to take action on the problem once the FAA issues a final rule on the wiring of in-flight entertainment systems. Costs per plane were estimated at between zero and $170,000 depending on whether the carrier chose to leave the system turned off during flight, removed the system or made extensive modifications. Attention was drawn to the entertainment systems during the investigation of the fiery 1998 crash of a SwissAir MD-11 off the eastern coast of Canada. All 229 people aboard were killed. That crash remains under investigation by Canadian officials and the exact cause of the fire that occurred in the ceiling of the cockpit has not been announced. FAA said a review of aftermarket in-flight entertainment systems showed the following range of problems: -- the system could not be turned off without cutting power to required systems, --the system could only be deactivated by pulling circuit breakers, -- procedures for deactivation not available to crew. An estimated 74 U.S.-registered aircraft would be affected by the 14 proposed airworthiness directives that apply to Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA - news) 737, 747, 757, 767, DC-9 MD-80 and DC-10 aircraft. The Airbus A340 [ARBU.UL] is also covered. Operators and other interested parties have until April 16 to submit comments on the FAA proposal or April 2 for the Airbus A340. Four more similar directives affecting other aircraft models are being developed, FAA said. |
||
| AP Washington
FAA Proposes New In-Flight Rules WASHINGTON (AP) -- Certain airlines would have to rewire their in-flight entertainment systems or keep them turned off during flights under new rules proposed Friday by the Federal Aviation Administration. The proposed rules stem from an FAA investigation of the entertainment systems following the September 1998 crash of a Swissair plane flying to Geneva from New York. An electrical problem is suspected, though the cause remains under investigation. In case of smoke, a burning smell, or an electrical short, airline crews would want to shut off nonessential electrical equipment to try to isolate the problem, but the entertainment systems on some aircraft can't be turned off without also shutting down other systems crucial to keeping the plane in the air. FAA spokesman Les Dorr Jr. said the proposed rules were not connected to any possible cause of the Swissair accident, but the crash spurred the agency to begin looking at airplane entertainment systems. At least 74 airplanes have entertainment systems that would need to be modified, most of them flown by American Airlines, Continental Airlines or Hawaiian Airlines. The planes affected are certain Boeing, McDonnell Douglas and Airbus models. Air carriers would have 18 months from the time the rule is adopted to make the necessary modifications. The FAA will accept comments on the proposal until next month.
|
||
| U.S.
LOOKS INTO FAA'S ALASKA AIR OVERSIGHT AGENCY'S RELATIONSHIP WITH AIRLINE
QUESTIONED
PAUL SHUKOVSKY and TRACY JOHNSON P-I REPORTERS 04/13/2000 Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Copyright 2000) Federal agents investigating the crash of Alaska Airlines Flight 261 and the airlines' maintenance operations are also examining the Federal Aviation Administration's oversight of the airline, according to criminal justice and aviation industry sources. . . . Such an investigation would focus on whether Alaska encouraged criminally improper maintenance practices that were either sanctioned by or ignored by the FAA. . . . Alaska has been under investigation since at least December 1998, when agents of the FBI and the Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General seized company records in raids at the airline's Seattle offices and at its maintenance hangar in Oakland, Calif. . . . The investigation was expanded to include circumstances around the Jan. 31 crash of Alaska Flight 261, which killed 88 passengers and crew. . . . Former Department of Transportation Inspector General Mary Schiavo , whose job through much of the 1990s included being chief watchdog of FAA integrity, said yesterday reports that the FAA has been lax on Alaska reflect "the good-old-boy network" in aviation. "It is just a comfortable way of doing business, the path of least resistance," said Schiavo, who is now an attorney in private practice. "Usually, nothing happens. It's only when something happens that they get caught. Here it is very different because there are a lot of dead people" (from Flight 261). Schiavo said that when she was inspector general, she often got complaints from FAA inspectors overseeing many different airlines saying that "when they got tough, they got transferred." Yet Schiavo said she cannot recall a successful criminal prosecution of an FAA inspector for allowing violations of Federal Aviation Regulations. Prosecutors would have to prove the inspector knowingly violated the law and wasn't simply lax or incompetent.. "If they just did a horrible, sloppy job, the U.S. attorney wouldn't go criminal," Schiavo said. "You have to prove criminal intent and that is an extremely high standard."
|
||
| Scheduled
14 CFR Part 121 operation of Air Carrier DELTA AIR LINES INC Incident occurred Wednesday, January 10, 2001 at Salt Lake City, UT Aircraft: Boeing 767, registration: N104DA Injuries: 165 Uninjured. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On January 10, 2001, a Delta Airlines Boeing 767 landed in foggy conditions at Salt Lake City, Utah. At or shortly after touchdown, several circuit breakers popped, an electrical wire bundle in the E&E bay shorted out, and a small fire broke out causing smoke in the cockpit. The aircraft taxied to the gate uneventfully and the smoke stopped when the engines were shut down. The passengers and crew deplaned normally without injuries..
|
NTSB
Identification: LAX01IA066
Scheduled 14 CFRPart 121 operation of Air Carrier DELTA AIRLINES INC. Incident occurred Friday, December 29, 2000 at HONOLULU, HI Aircraft: Lockheed L-1011, registration: N735D Injuries: 300 Uninjured. On December 29, 2000, about 2115 hours Hawaiian standard time, a Lockheed L-1011, N735D, operated by Delta Airlines as flight 219, experienced an electrical fire forward of the flight engineer's station while en route from San Francisco, California, to Honolulu, Hawaii. The flight was about 2 hours out of Honolulu, and continued for an uneventful landing, arriving at the gate at 2330. There were no injuries to the airline transport rated pilot, commercial rated co-pilot, airline transport rated flight engineer, 10 flight attendants, or the 287 passengers. The regularly scheduled domestic flight was operating under 14 CFR Part 121 and an instrument flight plan was filed. The flight originated at San Francisco at 1910. The flight was cruising at 32,000 feet msl in clouds at the time of the incident. A few minutes before the incident the flight was experiencing a phenomenon called Saint Elmo's fire. The phenomenon is a discharge of static electricity often seen on airplanes flying through or near stormy weather. Static electricity from clouds collects on the airplane structure and discharges from sharp points in the form of visible light. This activity lasted for about 3 minutes, after which an arc was observed at the location of the windshield heat wire bundle above the first officer's side window. The crew donned their smoke goggles and masks. Two of the windshield heat circuit breakers had opened and the crew opened the remaining breakers. The panel covering the wire bundle area was opened for application of a Halon fire bottle on the burnt area of the bundle. Post incident examination of the affected wires revealed electrical arcing had occurred between the airplane structure, an Adel clamp, and a 30-wire bundle, with burning occurring to 20 of the wires. The wire bundle passes behind the flight engineer's station and overhead to the heated windshield. |
|
| http://www.usu.edu/~news/news@usu/archive/11-20-00.htm
Contact: Cynthia Furse, 797-2870 USU HELPING TO MAKE AIR TRAVEL SAFER LOGAN -- The holidays mean more traveling, particularly by air. For those who fear airline tragedies, it can be especially stressful. Utah State University is working to alleviate some of those concerns.
Students led by Professor Cynthia Furse, assistant professor in the electrical engineering department at USU, are developing an answer to a dilemma of airline safety that has caught the attention of the FAA, the National Transportation Safety Board, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Agency and the White House. The focus is on faulty wiring. |
||
|
NTSB Identification: LAX01IA073.
Scheduled 14 CFR
Part 121 operation of Air Carrier EVERGREEN INT'L. AIRLINES,
INC.
Accident occurred Friday, January 05, 2001 at Honolulu,HI
Aircraft: Boeing 747-200F, registration: N470EV Injuries: 3 Uninjured.
On January 5, 2001, about 1620 hours Hawaiian standard time, a
Boeing
747-200F, N470EV, operated by Evergreen International Airlines, Inc., experienced smoke in the cockpit en route from Honolulu, Hawaii, to Pago Pago, American Somoa. The flight was about 2 hours out of Honolulu at flight level 340. The pilot declared an emergency and returned to Honolulu for an uneventful landing. The aircraft was not damaged. There were no injuries to the airline transport rated pilot, airline transport rated co-pilot, nor the airline transport rated flight engineer. The regularly scheduled cargo flight was operating under 14 CFR Part 121. An instrument flight plan was filed.
Post incident examination of the cockpit area revealed a hot
incandescent lamp dimmer, Boeing part number 60b40024-3. The
unit was still hot after 2 hours without electrical power.
Neither of the two circuit breakers attached to the dimmer assembly
were open. When opened manually, both breakers were noted to be
"red hot." Scorching was noted around terminal LV1
and on the lower side of both circuit breaker covers.
Index for Jan2001 | Index of months Source; http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20010205X00395&key=1 |
|||||||
|
TSB Class Of Investigation: 5 TSB Occurrence No.: A01Q0019 Event Information Smoke - cockpit Aircraft Information CDN Registration: C-FTLW Foreign Registration: Flight #: ACA 616 Aircraft Category: Aeroplane Country of Registration: CANADA Make: DOUGLAS Model: DC9 32 Year Built: 1968 Amateur Built: No Engine Make: PRATT & WHITNEY Engine Model: JT8D-7 Engine Type: Turbo jet Gear Type: Land Phase of Flight: Taxi Damage: Unknown Owner: AIR CANADA Operator: AIR CANADA (5262) Operator Type: Commercial Air Canada DC-9, registration C-FTLW operating as Air Canada 616 scheduled for Montreal-Dorval to St. John's, Newfoundland. The aircraft was taxiing when an electrical arc took place in the cockpit and smoke appeared. The problem was caused by a wire which short-circuited in the map reading light on the Captain's (left) side (presumably the one on the control yoke) The aircraft returned to the gate. Maintenance crews found the short circuit in the light assembly was due to the deterioration of the insulation on the connector. The fleet manager will inspect the condition of the connectors in the map lights and briefcase lights on the entire DC9 fleet to prevent a recurrence of the same problem. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| November
4, 2000 - 757 Makes Emergency Landing
Smoke Reported In Cockpit MIAMI, Florida (USA) - A 757 made an emergency landing at Miami International Airport Friday night. Miami-Dade fire officials said that an American Airlines pilot reported smoke in the cockpit. Emergency vehicles manned the runway and the plane landed safely. |
|||||||
| November
1, 2000 - Singapore Jet May Have Been On Wrong Runway
SINGAPORE - The Singapore Airlines flight that crashed at Taipei's airport on Monday night, killing nearly 80 people, may have hit construction equipment while taking off on a runway closed for repairs, it emerged yesterday. The Boeing 747-400 bound for Los Angeles with 159 passengers and 20 crew plunged to the ground and burst into flames shortly after take-off in a heavy storm that was originally thought to have been the cause of the crash. But latest reports indicate the aircraft may have mistakenly used a runway under repair and may have struck parked equipment. Seventy-six people people were killed instantly, and a pregnant woman died in hospital early yesterday. Of the other 102 people on board, 58 were still in hospital yesterday. Remarkably, 44 people escaped with barely a scratch. The jet broke into three pieces and burned fiercely after crashing in typhoon winds and torrential rain. Many of the corpses were charred beyond recognition, and some of the injured suffered horrific burns. Investigators rushed to the disaster scene at Taiwan's international airport, with aviation experts from Singapore and the United States due to arrive on the island in the coming hours. The "wrong runway" theory developed after the 48-year-old Malaysian pilot, C.K. Foong, who survived the crash, said he saw something on the runway and hit it just before take-off. "He saw something there," Singapore Airlines' public affairs vice-president, Rick Clements, said in Singapore. "It might have been a vehicle, it might have been a tyre, I don't know." The Taiwan television channel TVBS speculated that the wrong runway had been used for the take-off, showing footage of a hydraulic mechanical shovel and cement blocks littering 05R runway, closed for maintenance and repair. The two-metre high-shovel had clearly been hit in the front by something, the footage showed. Taipei airport has two parallel runways, with a third used occasionally as a back-up. A member of the investigating team from Taiwan's flight safety commission told reporters that the possibility the wrong runway had been used could not be ruled out, but investigations were continuing. The search of the mangled wreckage was hampered by the typhoon winds and rains, which whipped up the debris. Charred bodies were laid out in a temporary morgue set up at the airport, while anguished relatives were brought to the site. Investigators had already questioned three pilots, who survived the crash, and obtained copies of conversations between the pilots and air traffic controllers. Chang You-heng, head of Taiwan's Civil Aeronautics Administration, said the causes of the tragedy were "still not clear", but added that "take-off was allowable under the weather conditions". "Obviously the cockpit voice recorder will be able to answer a lot of questions," Mr Clements said in Singapore. The crash was the first serious accident involving Singapore Airlines. In December 1997, 104 people died when a Boeing 737 operated by the airline's fully-owned subsidiary, Silk Air, crashed in Indonesia. It shattered Singapore Airlines' otherwise proud safety record, which had previously included only a handful of technical incidents in its 28-year history. The airline's chairman, Michael Fam, said: "This is a tragic day for all of us. We wish to express our sincere regrets to all concerned for this horrifying accident. "Our immediate priority is to take care of all the affected passengers and crew and their respective families." Singapore Airlines is the world's 11th-largest airline in terms of passenger traffic. It employs more than 13,000 people and serves more than 40 countries on every continent except South America. |
|||||||
|
| Friday, October 13, 2000 Boeing near deal with UPS to convert 30 used planes for cargo
Boeing
Jobs | Boeing
Forum | BA
Ticker ASSOCIATED PRESS and KIRO 7
EYEWITNESS NEWS NEW YORK --
Boeing Co., the world's largest manufacturer of airplanes, is close to a
deal with United Parcel Service to convert 30 used jumbo jets into
freighters for moving cargo, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.
The companies have reached a tentative pact calling for the
conversion of a fleet of MD-11 passenger planes into cargo jets. The
deal, expected to be completed soon, is said to be worth up to $1.5
billion.
The companies are also in the early stages of discussions to convert
larger 747 models for cargo use.
Boeing began expanding into aircraft modification two years ago. If
the UPS deal is completed, it would provide a huge boost for the
division, industry analysts say. |
Wire Cracks Found
in Tests of Older Jets![]() WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Cracked insulation was found in the wires of six older, recently retired aircraft, but the Federal Aviation Administration said Wednesday it had no immediate safety concerns. Engineers removed wires from high-stress areas of the aircraft that were more than 20 years old as part of a government-industry task force effort to determine the extent to which aging wiring may threaten safety. The aviation industry became sharply focused on wiring after the 1996 crash of a TWA Boeing 747. The investigation of a Swissair MD-11 crash off the 1998 has focused on wiring in the cockpit. USA Today reported Wednesday that, in one of the aircraft examined, a Lockheed L-1011 wide-bodied jet, four cracks were found in every 1,000 feet of wire tested. http://airlinebiz.com/wire/10112000#MAIN (See Full Story!) |
Thursday October 12, 4:33 pm Eastern Time
Doomed Alaska jet may have lacked key parts - paper
Source: http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/001012/n12471604.html
SEATTLE, Oct 12 (Reuters) - A shortage of replacement parts for an
Alaska Airlines MD-80 jet undergoing maintenance 28 months before it
crashed may have played a role in a decision not to replace a key tail
mechanism, the Seattle Times reported on Thursday.
Documents from a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) probe of
the crash off the California coast last January that killed all 88 on
board show the word ``panic'' written next to a maintenance log entry
about locating new parts, the newspaper reported.
The findings were part of an NTSB interview with former Alaska mechanic
John Liotine, who recommended replacing the
jackscrew controlling the jet's horizontal stabiliser but was overruled.
The pilots of the doomed plane reported problems controlling the
stabiliser and the NTSB probe has implicated the jackscrew, which was
found coated with metal shards and might not have been properly
lubricated.
Liotine told federal regulators in 1998 that Alaska, the nation's 10th
largest airline and a subsidiary of Alaska Air Group Inc. (NYSE:ALK -
news), was falsifying maintenance records.
Alaska declined to comment on the latest report, citing NTSB
restrictions on investigation participants speaking publicly during a
probe.
Liotine told the NTSB that finding a replacement jackscrew, which could
cost up to $60,000, would have delayed the aircraft's return to service,
the newspaper reported.
The NTSB documents also showed that a pilots' union representative
claimed that investigators had found no evidence that Alaska had ordered
a replacement jackscrew, the paper reported.
In his initial test, Liotine had reported that the jackscrew was worn
almost to its legal limit and called for replacement. Other mechanics
ran several follow-up tests and recorded readings well within the legal
limit, overriding Liotine's recommendation.
Liotine's complaints triggered a Federal Aviation Administration probe
that found that six mechanics and inspectors at Alaska's Oakland,
Calif., facility had falsified records or violated regulations.
Alaska has referred to Liotine as a disgruntled employee who was placed
on paid leave in 1999 and ousted from his former position as union
president. He filed a libel suit against the company last month,
according to news reports.
The airline has taken numerous steps to beef up safety, including
sponsoring a comprehensive review of operations and
appointing a new vice president for safety. It has repeatedly insisted
it never knowingly allowed unsafe planes into service.
| NTSB Identification: ATL01IA001
Scheduled 14 CFR 121 operation of CONTINENTAL AIRLINES Accident
occurred OCT-01-00 at BIRMINGHAM, AL On October 1, 2000, at 1650 central daylight time, a McDonnell Douglas MD-80, N69826, operated by Continental Airlines as flight 1579, experienced an electrical fire during cruise flight at flight level 310 near Birmingham, Alabama. Flight 1579 was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 as a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Atlanta, Georgia, to Houston, Texas. The flight departed Hartsfield International Airport in Atlanta, Georgia, at approximately 1720 eastern daylight time with two air transport pilots, one jump-seat rider, three flight attendants, and 141 passengers on board. The airplane sustained minor damage and the jump-seat rider received minor injuries; there were no other injuries reported. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the incident, and flight 1579 operated on an instrument flight rules flight plan. According to the pilot, approximately 15 minutes into the flight, the cockpit filled with smoke and he heard a loud popping sound and saw sparks emitting from the area of the jump-seat. The jump-seat rider reported that he heard an explosion and leaned forward to avoid heat which he felt on his left shoulder. When the jump-seat rider looked at his left shoulder he noticed that his shirt was burning. He extinguished the fire on his shirt, and put on his oxygen mask, since the cockpit was filled with smoke. The pilot declared an emergency and imitated a descending right turn. The flight diverted into Birmingham, Alabama, and landed without further incident. The preliminary examination of the airplane disclosed a 2 by 1 1/2-inch fire-damaged hole in the left jump-seat wall. Several heavy gauge electrical wires were severed and welded together on the opposite side of the wall. There were also four 50 ampere circuit breakers popped on the left circuit breaker panel behind the pilot's seat. |
| Date:
Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:02 PM
Subject: More On Wiring This is what was published in the Seattle P-I today, Oct 5, 2000, in the business section under BRIEFS. "FAA considers order to check 737 wiring The Federal Aviation Administration has proposed asking operators of some Boeing 737 jets to inspect a portion of the fuel-quantity measuring system for a potentially dangerous electrical fault. The FAA said in a notice placed in the Federal Register on tuesday that it had received two reports of wires chafed down to the conductor in the fuel-measuring system in the right main fuel tanks of the 737s. The FAA said its proposed airworthiness directive, giving six months for the work to be done, would apply to about 800 U. S. registered 737, -400, and -500 jets. Boeing played down the safety hazard, saying there was not enough voltage in the line to pose an immediate risk. In response to 747 ignition concerns in 1997, boeing maintained that aircraft aircraft was designed to eliminate all ignition sources from the fuel system and that even if a spark were created, the energy would not be enough to ignite a center wing tank." |
| October 2, 2000 - Plane
Makes Emergency Landing BIRMINGHAM, Alabama (USA) - An
electrical fire in the cockpit of a Continental Airlines jet headed to
Dallas forced the crew to make an emergency landing at Birmingham
International Airport, an airline spokeswoman said.
A crew member sitting behind the pilot on Flight 1579 from Atlanta suffered minor burns, spokeswoman Erica Roy said. There were no other injuries, she said, and the fire was out when the McDonnell Douglas DC-9 carrying 147 passengers and crew landed at about 5 p.m. Sunday. The passengers were transferred to another Continental plane, Roy said. |
EXTRACT
From: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_07/agingair.html
4.
REVIEW AND UPDATE STANDARD PRACTICES FOR WIRING In addition, the FAA recommended that a process that trains maintenance personnel to recognize aging effects on electrical systems and alerts them to proper repair procedures be defined. |
| EU
Plans Air Safety Agency BRUSSELS,
Belgium (AP) _
The European Union's head office Wednesday revealed plans to create an aviation safety agency. ``The EU will at last have the means to conduct a genuine aviation safety policy,'' said EU Transport Commissioner Loyola de Palacio in a statement. The proposed agency would be responsible for drawing up and regulating EU-wide airplane safety and security standards. ``The agency will encourage the harmonization of technical rules and especially ensure their uniform application,'' the Commission said in a statement. It added that the agency would be loosely styled on the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, acting independently of national governments. The EU has already introduced regulations on noise and gas emissions for airplanes, which the agency will also enforce. Late last year, the Commission revealed plans to establish joint air traffic control of Europe's skies to replace a patchwork of national management systems and to reduce growing flight delays. The 15 EU nations are currently in talks with the aviation industry to work out plans for joint management. Increased cooperation among air-traffic authorities is already reducing flight delays according Eurocontrol, the agency that coordinates air traffic management in 39 European nations. In a statement this month, Eurocontrol said the average delay on commercial flights was 3.5 minutes, a 30 percent decrease on the August 1999 average, despite a 4 percent increase in the number of flights. |
| Story
Filed: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 7:19 AM EST SEP 12, 2000,
M2 Communications - An SAS aircraft had to land with smoke in the cabin on Sunday (10 September), the third such occurrence within the last six months. The aircraft, a Ragna Viking (SK1561), was en route from Norway's Gardermoen airport in Oslo to Paris, France when it was forced to make a controlled emergency landing at Torp's Sandefjord airport, Norway. The aircraft reportedly had 48 passengers aboard, none of whom were thought to be injured. SAS grounded the aircraft upon landing as a precaution, and said that it was possible that the smoke was caused by a short circuit in the cockpit. According to Aftenposten, a daily Norwegian newspaper, SAS has confirmed that this incident was not the first of its kind. The Norwegian accident investigation commission has said that the incident should be regarded as serious when seen in connection with the other incidents aboard SAS aircraft as well as related incidents on a global scale and the Swissair crash off the Canadian east coast last year. Finn Heimdal, the head of the commission, speculated that the increasing amount of electronic equipment in aircraft cockpits might increase the risk of fire. According to Heimdal, there are more reports of smoke in the cockpits of Norwegian aircraft than the average for other countries. |
|
Sep 11, 2000 Delegates at this week's Aircraft Quality and Safety Conference in Brussels will hear that a new risk assessment system rates Air Canada as the world's safest airline.The new league table, backed by major industry and an international development bank, takes into account safety factors such as fleet composition, management structure and safety regulations in the the airline's home country, as well as its accident record. According to the London Sunday Times the system, developed by a former test pilot, calculates that passengers traveling with Air Canada have only a one in 1.3 million chance of being involved in any kind of accident. Those odds come down to 1 in 333 on the worst rated carrier, Air Georgia. Two Australian airlines, Qantas and Ansett, are rated number two and three; Germany's Lufthansa is fourth, with US majors American Airlines and United Airlines entering the top twenty at five and six. John Trevett, who developed the system, has been backed by the European Bank for Reconstruction who were anxious to not to book staff on to airline's with poor safety records. Mr Trevett told the UK newspaper: "The law has changed, so companies are increasingly keen to minimise their exposure to risk." Despite a fall in overall accident rates last year large companies are becoming concerned about the chances of being sued for booking employees on to an unsafe flight that is then involved in an accident. The Trevett system has been adapted and developed by the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers in association with the Shell company and the bank. |
|
Sent: Saturday, September
02, 2000 2:33 AM Subject:
Flying Really the Safest Transportation?
A Reinforcing Argument Support for the GAO position about how best to measure safety comes from an essay in the August 7, 1999 edition of New Scientist magazine. Author Andrew Weir asserted that deaths or accidents per distance traveled dilute the accident rate for airplanes in comparison to cars or trains. Further, he argued, while the accident risk in a car or train is more evenly spread across the journey, the opposite is true for airplanes, where 70 percent of the accidents occur on takeoff or landing, just 4 percent of the journey time. For these reasons, Weir suggested, deaths should be measured against the number of journeys made. This is not quite the same as the departure metric suggested by the GAO above but certainly represents a related approach. Weir used "passenger journeys," so 100 people in a jetliner taking off represent 100 passenger journeys in one departure. Weir claimed the "passenger journey" metric is used by the insurance industry. "By this measure, air travel takes on a rather different complexion," Weir wrote. "Deaths per 100 million passenger journeys are, on average, 55 for airliners compared to 4.5 for cars, and 2.7 for trains. Only motorbikes, at 100 deaths per 100 million passenger journeys, are more risky than aircraft on this basis." Indeed, in the U.S. motorcycle drivers are sometimes referred to as "organ donors" because of their high accident rate. Weir is saying that driving is ten times safer than flying, when measured as deaths per journeys. Further, he argues, the fatal accident rate in commercial aviation has stabilized at about one per 1.5 million departures, and it has stubbornly remained there despite the infusion into the fleet of the latest generation of jets equipped with fly-by-wire (FBW) and flight management technology. From Air Safety Week; Weir's take on air safety flies in the face of the widely held industry view that flying is the safest mode of travel. Alan Downs' 1997 book, "Beyond the Looking Glass - Overcoming the Seductive Culture of Corporate Narcissism," may bear on the industry perspective of air safety. Downs points out that those listening only to the beat of their own corporate drum might not hear the locomotive of destructive libel bearing down the tracks on them. "A narcissistic company rarely handles criticism constructively," Downs writes. "Instead, it chooses to manipulate feedback to suit its own purposes. Some tactics used include putting a positive spin on news that is otherwise negative, and attacking the critic." (Note 1: For the full text of Weir's opinion essay, see this website: http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19990807/flightinto.html . Note 2: We are indebted to Bart Crotty for bringing Down's observations on the cult of corporate narcissism to our attention.) |
|
--- U.S.
to determine if old planes are less safe --- Alarmed by aged wiring's possible role in dooming TWA Flight 800, a U.S. safety official ordered a study on Wednesday into possible links between older aircraft and accidents and whether passengers should be told the age of planes they board. Jim Hall, head of the National Transportation Safety Board, acted after staff investigators said a short circuit in aging wiring probably caused the explosion of TWA Flight 800, a 25-year-old Boeing 747-100. |
|
August 22, 2000 - AirTran
Emergency Was More Dire Than Known, Wash Post Says WASHINGTON
(USA) -
When AirTran Airways Inc. pilots made an emergency landing in Greensboro, North Carolina two weeks ago, their plane may have been in more serious trouble than first indicated, the Washington Post reported, citing unnamed sources close to a federal investigation. When smoke from an electrical fire began filling the cabin, the pilots
of the McDonnell Douglas Corp. DC-9 weren't certain they could make
it back to Greensboro and considered landing the aircraft on a highway,
the newspaper reported. The problem began with a circuit-breaker panel
in the cockpit and wasn't routine, the Post said, citing unnamed sources. The plane involved in the emergency landing was originally built for Turkish Airlines in 1970 and was sold to ValuJet in 1994, the Post said. Since ValuJet merged with AirTran in 1997 following a DC-9 disaster in the Florida Everglades, all of the planes have been re-certified for safety, an AirTran spokesman told the newspaper. McDonnell Douglas, a unit of Boeing Co., produces military and commercial aircraft. |
|
ORIGINAL FAA LOT OF 1,819 ITEMS AVAILABLE OF APPROXIMATELY 3. 6 MB. Contact jking1@mediaone.net SPECIAL ADD-ON
RECEIVED THIS DAY BY BY FAX
8/10/00
59083
DOUG
FUEL
QUANTITY WIRING
CHAFING ARCING
INSP/MAINT
OTHER
DC-10-30
ANPO138-502
FUEL
TANK # 3 PROBE 6 08/10/2000 28
47926
“D” CHECK, FQI SYSTEM WIRING CHAFING AND ARCING INSIDE
FUEL TANK # 3. PROBE #
6, HARNESS FOUND CHAFING ON MOUNT BRACKET OF THE FILL PILOT-VALVE IN
BAY R07 (XORS: 298-500). WIRES
3E900E226R X 3E901E22WH
DAMAGED THROUGH OUTER SLEEVE INSULATION CAUSING ARCING ON BRACKET.
HARNESS WAS EXCESSIVELY SLACK.
HARNESS ANPO138-502 REPLACED IAW MM 28-91-08 FRM PROBE
6 (T2-104) TO JUNC PROBE E2 (T2-102).
PERFORMED STATIC BOND TEST ON ALL BOOST PUMPS, D.C. START PUMPS, FEED SYSTEM DUCTS, RE FUEL DUCTS, VENT SYSTEM. OVER ONE HUNDRED (100( READINGS GREATER THAN 100 MILLI-OHMS ACROSS ALL 3 MAIN TANKS AND AUX TANKS. THE NECESSARY ACTION WAS TAKEN. (RE-BONDING).
So,
arcing in the wiring of fuel-tank fuel quantity indicating systems (FQIS)
is NOT an unknown phenomena. i.e. TWA800
was no fluke. It's just that it also had the fuel
heat-soaked by a long ground-run of the aircon packs under the CWT (centre-wing
tanks). Sparks plus flammable vapour = explosion |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
NEED
THIRD IN COCKPIT
High-tech cockpit safety devices are great, but one that was thrown out in the interest of economy was the flight engineer (AW&ST July 17, p. 66). Instead of putting someone in the jump seat to see what distractions and interruptions occur, why not put a third pilot there to:
Flight engineer certificates wouldn't be needed, and the airplane wouldn't have to be modified. If airlines decide to use exter- nal TV cameras to monitor tires, brakes and engines during takeoff or for suspected problems, the extra pilot could have the responsibility. As always, the question is: "What price safety?" Mike Scherer |
||||
Hong Kong-New York Flight Makes Detour To Ontario
|
||||
|
||||
AirTran: Where There's Smoke...
|
||||
|
You will recall that I sent you
(a couple of weeks back) a copy of the FAA AD (based upon the French
AD) that mentions the wiring faults that led to this trim runaway
and the Thai A310 crash at Surat Thani - as well as the near accident
at Dubai (Emirates A310). This constitutes evidence that wiring's
not just a Boeing problem. In that AD it also mentioned that it was
an interim fix and that further (Airbus) action was anticipated.
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82362&perpage=15&pagenumber=2 (above link is now upgraded)http://av-info.faa.gov/ad/NM00/00-02-04.html
More AIR CRASH RESCUE NEWS:------
July 21, 2000 - Malfunction Caused Fatal Plane Crash, Reports BANGKOK, Thailand - Equipment failure has been identified as the cause of an air disaster that claimed 101 lives in Thailand, according to press reports. A report from Thailand's state news agency says the "trim" malfunction caused Thai Airways International Airbus A310-200 aircraft to crash in December 1998. The report, posted on the website of the Thai News Agency, cited an unidentified source on the government panel. No findings have been officially released. "An examination of black-box data by a French neutral organisation also confirmed that the trim system of the plane had malfunctioned, but did not indicate the cause of the problem," the agency said. It quoted the source saying that the unidentified organisation had been asked to double-check and clearly indicate the cause of the trim problem. Trim, which regulates whether a plane is kept level or heads up or down, can be controlled automatically by the airplane or manually by the pilot. There was no official confirmation of the findings from either Airbus Industrie, Thailand's Aviation Department or Thai Airways. Transport Minister Suthep Thaugsuban, whose sister was killed in the crash, has said that the report would be issued early this year. There has been no explanation for the delay. The flight from Bangkok to Surat Thani, 330 miles to the south, crashed after the plane failed to pull up after the pilot aborted a third attempted landing in rain at night. The plane crashed into a swamp near the small airport. Forty-five people survived. The pilot, co-pilot and nine crew were among the 101 people killed. So were 14 of 26 foreign passengers, the dead including citizens of the United States, Austria, Great Britain, Finland, Germany, Japan and Norway. |
|
FUEL
TANK SAFETY INITIATIVE TARGETS WORLD’S AIRLINERS As
a result of the TWA 800 flight 800 explosion in 1996, the U.S. Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) is working on a three-pronged rulemaking
package that includes setting new certification standards and mandatory
maintenance instructions on
fuel systems for newly designed aircraft worldwide.
It also calls for design reviews and mandatory maintenance on
existing aircraft. The
regulation, affecting 6,000 aircraft in the current transport fleet with
30 or more seats, would require a design review revalidating the fuel
tank system design to ensure that failures could not create ignition
sources within the fuel tanks. Manufacturers
would also be required to design specific programs for the maintenance
and inspection of the tanks to ensure the continued safety of fuel tank
systems. The
proposal also calls for changes to aircraft operating rules, requiring
operators to develop and implement an FAA-approved maintenance and
inspection program for fuel tanks. The
proposed design standards call for a new flammability standard for newly
designed aircraft, which minimizes the development of combustible vapors
in fuel tanks. Alternatively,
manufacturers must provide a means to prevent catastrophic damage if
ignition does occur. The
new standard also requires assessment of whether ignition sources could
be created by failures and for the development of mandatory fuel tank
maintenance and inspection programs for newly designed aircraft. Aircraft
affected include these aircraft and manufacturers: Airbus, Bombardier,
De Havilland, ATR, Dornier, Embraer, Boeing, Fokker, Lockheed, Saab and
British Aerospace. For more information: FAA Website: www.faa.gov
|
|
ICAO DRAFTING POST-ACCIDENT ‘FAMILY ASSISTANCE’ GUIDANCE On the recommendations of the Spanish and U.S. delegations to the 32nd Assembly Meeting of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Montreal, Canada, last fall, ICAO is developing guidance materials for all member nations on how to assist victims and family members of those killed and injured in major aviation accidents. At the assembly meeting, a family assistance resolution was adopted that also urges ICAO nations to review, develop, and implement family assistance programs. A key part of resolution calls for a homogeneous global solution to dealing with the victims of aircraft accidents and their families, irrespective of the nationality of the victims or where the accidents may occur. The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been implementing a comprehensive family assistance program over the past few years. In legislation and by executive order, all airlines that fly in and out of the U.S., including foreign flag carriers, are required to have a family assistance program approved by both the NTSB and U.S. DOT. The NTSB also has a full time family affairs staff and is assisting ICAO in developing guidance. For more information: Gary Abe, NTSB Deputy Director for Family Affairs, Tel: (202) 314-6185, Fax: (202) 314-6638, NTSB website: www.ntsb.gov. |
|
THE NETHERLANDS INAUGURATES NEW INDEPENDENT, MULTI-MODAL SAFETY BOARD The
new independent, multi-modal Dutch Transport Safety Board (DTSB), (Raad
voor de Transportveiligheid, RVTV), was officially inaugurated on June
30 in The Hague, The Netherlands. The DTSB brings together former
separate accident investigation boards of the different transport
sectors: the Dutch Railway Accident Investigation Board, the Dutch
Maritime Board, the Netherlands Aviation Safety Board and the former
Dutch Road Safety Council.
The
new DTSB is structured as one overall independent safety board with four
chambers responsible for accident investigation in their sector – air,
rail, marine and highway. A
major distinction of the DTSB is that it is an independent government
organization and is not part of the Ministry of Transport, Public Works
and Water Management.
The
board is comprised of the chairman and vice-chairman of each chamber,
together with the overall board chairman, Pieter van Vollenhoven, who
also chairs the International Transportation Safety Association (ITSA),
and several general transport safety experts.
The staff of the new DTSB will consist of about 32 employees,
including many staff and chief investigators of the old modal boards. For
more information: DTSB, Prins Clauslaan 18, 2595 AJ The Hague; Tel:
31-70-3337000, Fax: 31-70-3337077. |
|
Out of the June 21-22 meeting of the
Aircraft Wiring and Inert Gas Generator (AWIGG) working group meeting in
Indianapolis, Ind., participants offered a number of comments (see ASW,
June 26). A high level of thinking and a commitment to the issue
characterize the participants' post-meeting inputs:
"So far in the discussion of aging effect on aircraft wire, the focus has been on defects/damage that might cause a short and an arcing event and/or a fire. Damage to 'signal' (low energy) is discounted. However, there are high impedance/high gain circuits that can be disturbed by very small leakage currents. A couple examples are **flux gates and FQIS (Fuel Quantity Indication Systems). I would like to hear a presentation detailing all such systems and the performance impact of leakage currents/stray voltage that can result from small insulation cracks in the presence of contamination and moisture. I believe there are some significant flight safety risks, especially in IFR conditions that can arise for NAV, COM and flight control signal paths being disturbed." "Fire detection and suppression: Be an advocate for funding and then testing to determine airflow and 'leakage' in compartments that still need protection. Encourage the aviation industry to expand underutilized 'Class D' cargo fire suppression systems in to the E&E (electronics and equipment bay), cockpit, lavatory, overhead bin, and other fuselage compartments. Find an airline to act as a leader who will expand protection into these compartments even though no regulations yet exist which require the protection or system." "There appears to be a lack of 'hard' data from the airlines or operators on the quantity and frequency of wiring problems. I would like to see the AWIGG members try and quantify this and share the data with the AWIGG." "In the past two years, AWIGG has served as an information exchange for many new ideas to fight and prevent wire failures and aircraft fires. Some ideas are ready for prime time, but many need more work and funding. How about another AWIGG 'panel' to...select some promising ideas to NASA, FAA, or 'the Hill' (U.S. Congress) for more development and implementation?" "Possible subject for AWIGG coverage: Standard Repair Procedures - primary insulation damage, shield damage tolerance, chafe protection methods (tape wrap), convoluted tubing installation." "Possible initiatives: Move toward pushing for inspection requirements for wiring on both commercial and military vehicles. Need emphasis for encouraging and developing test methods, procedures and equipment which will work in the real world. Some of the good ideas which are 'out there' need to be further developed and combined (getting past proprietary issues) so we can improve passenger and operator safety. Need emphasis for using minimum standards as requirements for aircraft design (e.g., Mil-W-5088 or SAE spec as contractual requirement). This is needed to avoid having decision-makers overlook or overrule their technical advisors." **Note: Flux-gates (aka flux-valves) are the amplified pick-offs of the pendulous detector elements of gyro-magnetic compasses. |
|
Subject: Re: Some
things never change/1996 FAA [Yahoo! Clubs: sr111]
I remember the automobile industry carping about having to install seatbelts and later airbags, not to mention pollution control devices ... they were too expensive, impractical ... would make cars unaffordable to average Americans. Of course in the end, necessity was the mother of invention, and somehow they managed to make these improvements. I would expect Mr. Goldfarb's remarks to come from the airline industry, not those charged with regulating them in the public interest. I believe that the FAA has failed miserably as an advocate for the flying public. Personally, I'm not very interested in passengers' rights movement. For obvious reasons, the only passengers' right I care about is the right to arrive alive. But the indignities that air carriers subject their customers to are endemic of a regulatory body that is in bed with the industry. I've said before that we can't blame the police for the behavior of criminals, nor can we blame the FAA for gross neglect on the part of an air carrier or aircraft manufacturers. But as a matter of public policy, where there is crime, we need police. When an industry can't be trusted to act responsibly, we need to regulate its practices. Why isn't this an obvious problem that attracts the attention of the public and the legislative branch of government? Perhaps the double-talk has something to do with it. The FAA claims to certify new equipment that is to be installed in commercial aircraft. The people who actually perform this function are not, however, employees of the FAA, but rather receive their compensation from companies like Boeing and Santa Barbara Aerospace. In my humble opinion, that's the equivalent of no regulation at all. And why do FAA officials defend this pathetic system. Might it have something to do with the fact that many of the "Designated Engineering Representatives" who profit handsomely under the current scheme of things are former FAA employees? I've heard this program (DER) called a supplemental retirement income plan for the FAA. Isn't Mr. Goldfarb an industry consultant these days? How nice for him. It disgusts me to hear arrogant bureaucrat asses defend their moronic little agency. The FAA is broken. It's time to get it fixed! - Mark |
|
AIR CRASH RESCUE NEWS:
July 4, 2000 - Emergency Landing in Florida FORT MYERS, Florida (USA) - A flight bound for Miami from San Francisco made an emergency landing at Southwest Florida International Airport after the pilot reported a smoky haze in the cockpit. United Airlines flight 985 landed safely at 10:25 p.m. Monday. None of the 157 people on board was injured, airport spokeswoman Susan Sanders said. About half the passengers chose to rent cars in Fort Myers and drive the last 150 miles to Miami, rather than wait to continue on with their flight. The plane, a Boeing 767, was diverted to Fort Myers when the pilot reported the haze, Sanders said. |
Wednesday June 28, 6:49 pm Eastern Time
Swissair crash cases head for mediationBy David Morgan PHILADELPHIA, June 28 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge will begin mediating negotiations next month in 15 lawsuits stemming from the 1988 crash of SwissAir Flight 111 in hopes of encouraging individual settlements in the massive liability case, lawyers said on Wednesday. Closed-door negotiations were set to start July 17 before U.S. District Judge James Giles in lawsuits selected by attorneys for the plaintiffs and continue for about three weeks, possibly with other federal judges or magistrates serving as mediators. ``He wants to get the settlement process rolling sooner rather than later. He obviously wants to encourage that,'' said SwissAir attorney Michael Holland. SwissAir , SairGroup, SR Technics AG, Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA - news), SwissAir code-share partner Delta Air Lines Inc. (NYSE:DAL - news) and Interactive Flight Technologies Inc. have all been named as defendants in 167 separate lawsuits seeking a combined $16 billion in damages. Plaintiffs are the families of 229 people who died aboard SwissAir Flight 111 off Peggy's Cove, Nova Scotia, on Sept. 2, 1998, when the Boeing-made MD-11 aircraft plunged into the Atlantic Ocean killing everyone on board. Since last August, when the SwissAir case first came before Giles, only half a dozen suits have been settled despite the judge's repeated calls for individual settlement negotiations to produce results. ``After the 15 go through the process, I'm sure he'll set another conference,'' said Lee Kreindler, who chairs a plaintiffs' steering committee. The judge ordered mediated discussions at a pre-trial conference on June 19. Giles also is expected to rule by Aug. 31 on two defence motions. One motion would prevent 106 suits involving foreign plaintiffs from being heard in American courts. The other would put the remaining cases under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Death on the High Seas Act, which would exclude punitive damages. The defendants have already agreed to pay compensatory damages. Lawyers for crash victim survivors believe a fire caused by faulty wiring cased the disaster and allege that SwissAir knew the wiring posed substantial hazards at least seven years before the crash. |
| June
30, 2000 - Boeing 777 Laptop
Power Outlet Raises Safety Fears,
WSJ Says CHICAGO (USA) - Boeing Co.'s 777 jets operated by UAL Corp., the parent company of United Airlines Inc., have had passenger laptop power feeds switched off after safety concerns, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing company sources. AMR Corp., which owns American Airlines, is also carrying out an inquiry into power ports on all its aircraft after a European-built Airbus Industrie A300 made an emergency landing in May when sparks flew around one of the plane's in-seat power outlets. The power ports were first proposed in 1996 as a way to attract the lucrative business class passengers, the Journal said. Airlines were put on notice by U.S. senators that customer service must improve or Congress will reconsider legislation setting rules for the handling of flight delays and other passenger inconveniences. |