|
Aging, brittle wiring within aircraft
poses a hidden hazard that emerging technologies aim to address
Down to the Wire
By Cynthia Furse
& Randy Haupt, Utah State University
As today's military and commercial aircraft age past
their teen years, the many kilometers of wiring buried deep
within their structures begin to crack and fray. Once thought
to be rare and benign, such faults are found by the hundreds
in a typical aircraft. Unlike obvious cracks in a wing or
an engine, though, damaged wire is extremely difficult to
detect. But the resulting arcing and electromagnetic emissions
can be just as deadly: faulty wiring has been blamed for the
downing of Swissair 111 near Nova Scotia in 1998 and of TWA
800 off New York's Long Island in 1996 [see
Photo].
Indeed, any densely wired system is vulnerable--the space
shuttle, nuclear power plants, subways and railroads, even
the family car.
Public scrutiny
has prompted strongly worded recommendations from the likes
of NASA, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, and the
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) [see "Government and Industry Take Action"].
"The safety of the nation's wire systems is an issue of major
importance to us all," noted a White House report issued last
fall. Several months earlier, the NTSB concluded its lengthy
investigation of TWA 800 with the verdict that a short circuit
sparked an explosion in the center wing fuel tank. The condition
of the wiring, it noted, was "not atypical for an airplane
of its age." Among the NTSB's recommendations was to incorporate
into aircraft "new technology, such as arc-fault circuit breakers
and automated wire test equipment."
Solutions
are not straightforward. Among the most promising technologies
are advanced reflectometry methods, for routine maintenance;
so-called smart wire systems, for continual, on-the-spot wire
testing; and arc-fault circuit breakers and advanced fire
suppression techniques, for minimizing damage and injury should
a fault occur. Remaining challenges include detecting the
minuscule insulation breaks that encourage arcing; optimizing
the benefits and mitigating the risks of the various wire
testing techniques; and getting a better handle on the labyrinthine
complexity of aircraft wiring systems.
Failing the test of time
A healthy wire is
perhaps the simplest, yet most important, element in an electrical
system. Typically, a copper conductor (from 1 to 10 mm in
diameter) is covered by a thin outer insulation (from 0.5
to 2 mm thick). Damaged insulation can expose the copper,
giving rise to arcs, shorts, and electromagnetic emission
and interference. Arcing occurs when current flows from the
wire through ionized air to another conducting object, such
as a second wire or the aircraft structure. A short circuit
channels the current to an undesired conductor. If an external
shield or braid protecting a wire is broken, the resulting
antenna radiates the signal on the wire.
As the wire
ages, the insulation may become brittle and crack. Vibration
can also chafe the insulation as wires vibrate against each
other, a tie-down, or any other hard surface. Maintenance
can also be hard on wires, as they may be nicked by workers'
pliers, or bent beyond their tolerable radius, or sprinkled
with metal drill shavings, chemicals or water, or even used
as stepladders in hard-to-reach places. [see Photos that show cracked
and singed wiring taken from U.S. Navy planes.]
But perhaps
the greatest concern is the breakdown of the wire's insulation
when exposed to moisture. Insulation made from polyimide film,
often referred to by the brand-name Kapton, was once thought
to be the ideal wiring insulation and was widely used in both
military and commercial aircraft during the 1970s and early
'80s. A long-chain polymer that is both tough and durable,
with a very high resistivity, Kapton provides excellent electrical
insulation even at a thickness of less than a millimeter.
What was
not known initially was how Kapton held up to the moisture
that tends to condense in or near aircraft wiring harnesses.
This moisture is so prevalent that most wires are outfitted
with a drip loop, which prevents water droplets from running
down the cables and into critical electronics. Exposed to
this moisture, Kapton's long polymer chains break down, and
the insulation becomes brittle, developing small cracks that
in turn let in even more moisture. So-called wet arcs begin
to flow along these cracks, creating intermittent arcs too
small to trip normal circuit breakers and often too small
even to interfere with the signal transfer along the wire.
Nonetheless, the tiny arcs do begin to carbonize the insulation,
and carbon is an excellent conductor. Once enough carbon has
built up ("enough" depends on the type and thickness of the
insulation, the power handling of the wire, and other factors),
there can be a large explosive flashover, with exposed wires
spewing molten metal.
One would
hope that Kapton cracks are relatively rare. Not so, according
to a recent report by Lectromechanical Design Co., an electrical
research firm based in Sterling, Va. Using a proprietary tool
called the DelTest, Letromec engineers tested the wiring in
a Boeing 747, an Airbus A300, a Lockheed L-1011, and two DC-9s
that were each over 20 years old and had been retired by commercial
airlines within the previous six months. The results: 13 cracks
per 1000 meters of wire in the L-1011, down to 1.6 cracks
per 1000 meters in one of the DC-9s. With approximately 240
km of wire in the L-1011, this amounted to over 3000 cracks,
each a potential cause of catastrophic arcing.
Some time
after Kapton's problems came to light, in the late '70s, its
use was cut back, and aircraft manufacturers began replacing
it in some of the most critical wiring systems in planes in
service. Alternatives to Kapton include polyvinylchloride,
glass, nylon, polyester, and teflon. But polyimide can still
be found on thousands of aircraft in service, including the
McDonnell Douglas MD-11 and older Boeing 737s and 767s.
How old is too old?
Updating rather than
replacing old planes has become a standard way to save money.
Some aircraft being designed today, such as the Joint Strike
Fighter, may fly 100 years. Similarly, the B-52s flown by
the U.S. Air Force were built in 1961–62 and are expected
to remain operational until 2045. Its designers would have
never dreamed that this plane would fly for over 80 years.
Indeed, not much thought was given to replacing or inspecting
the wiring, because the planes were to have been retired long
before any problems developed.
So when
is it time to scrap an airplane because its wires are too
old? The answer depends on a complex array of factors--among
them calendar age, manufacturing variations, exposure to water,
ultraviolet light, temperature, vibration and g-forces, and
stress during normal use and maintenance.
Planes over
20 years old are virtually guaranteed to have wiring problems,
many of which turn up during routine maintenance. The average
age of civilian aircraft in use today is 18 years, and the
average age of military planes is 16 years. [See table.] Of course, most
fleets are composed of a mix of aircraft types and ages. Trying
to relate this information to wiring failure probability rates,
such as those in the table,
gives some idea why wiring problems are endemic today.
Short of
replacing an entire aircraft, how about replacing just the
wiring system? That also turns out to be hugely expensive--anywhere
from US $1 million to $5 million for a typical aircraft. Determining
what, when, or whether to replace then means weighing cost
against risk--a decision complicated by the fact that neither
the cost nor the risk has yet been fully characterized. What
is more, military planes get exposed to more hostile environments
than the average commercial plane, so extrapolation to other
types of planes is not necessarily accurate.
The maintenance nightmare
Snaking through an
aircraft are many kilometers of wire--some 17.5 km in a Navy
F-18C/D fighter, 240 km in a typical wide-body jet. The wire
is literally built into the aircraft, running through fuel
tanks, and twisted around hydraulic lines. Just reaching the
wiring harness often entails dismantling an aircraft's external
structure. And merely touching a wire, let alone disconnecting,
handling, and reconnecting it, heightens the risk that the
wire will be damaged.
But maintenance
workers do not always show due respect. They have been known
to stand on wires instead of step stools, to cut and splice
them poorly to get them out of the way of difficult-to-reach
places, and to smack connectors with hammers to loosen them.
Tiny razor-sharp metal shavings from maintenance or upgrades,
coupled with ordinary aircraft vibration, create the perfect
conditions for insulation damage.
Other parts
of the aircraft never get touched, but are no less problematic.
The dust bunnies and chaff that collect in these out-of-sight
areas are excellent tinder to turn sparks into smoke and flames.
Then there's the sticky "syrup" that collects in and around
wire bundles. This well-aged potion of condensation, toilet
and galley leaks, dust, hydraulic fluid, and various unnamable
ingredients is intensely caustic to most kinds of insulation.
One of the Navy and FAA directives for making aging wiring
safer has been simply to improve cleanliness within aircraft!
Compounding the maintenance nightmare is its high cost.
By one estimate, the Navy spends 1.8 million person-hours
each year to troubleshoot and repair its aircraft wiring systems.
Why state of the art isn't enough
Wire troubleshooting
is still very much a hands-on art that has changed little
over the last 40 years. Among the techniques in current use
are visual inspection, several versions of reflectometry,
and impedance testing. Each technique has its advantages and,
more importantly, disadvantages.
Visual inspection
is still the most common way to check for wiring failures.
It entails accessing the cables and then carefully checking
the insulation for holes and cracks, often no larger than
the head of a pin. Whole sections of wiring never get inspected:
chafed insulation can be hidden under clamps or around corners,
or within multiwire bundles, each consisting of 75 or more
wires. And many wire bundles are built right into the walls
of the aircraft.
Another
approach involves measuring the cable's resistance from end
to end. A low resistance means the cable is "good," and a
high resistance means that it is broken. When a very high
voltage (500 V or more) is placed between adjacent, supposedly
unconnected wires, current leakage from one wire to another
can indicate degraded insulation.
There is
some concern, though, that high voltage may in itself damage
the insulation. So nondestructive resistance tests, such as
those developed by Eclypse International Corp., Corona, Calif.,
use voltages of 28 V or less. A floating comparator analyzes
the currents on the cable as the input current is stepped
through several levels. In a healthy cable, Ohm's Law predicts
that the resistance will stay the same for all current levels.
If it does not, then something is wrong with the cable. The
method has been used to locate cold solder joints, bad crimps,
carbonization of the cable or connectors, and foreign matter
on or near the cables. And unlike the high-voltage tests,
it can be used on a fueled airplane. It does, though, still
require disconnecting and reconnecting the cables.
Several
techniques now used or under development involve reflectometry.
Common to all these methods is the sending of a signal (a
pulse, sine wave, or the like) down the wire and sensing the
reflection that returns from the wire's end. They are most
useful for detecting so-called hard errors, such as short
circuits, but have not proven useful for less obvious wire
problems.
Time domain
reflectometry (TDR) is customarily used when a wiring problem
is already suspected. A short, typically rectangular pulse
is sent down the cable, and the cable impedance, termination,
and length give a unique temporal signature to the reflected
signal. A trained technician then interprets the signature
to determine the health of the cable. Such signal interpretation
is particularly necessary for aircraft systems, where wires
branch into complicated network structures and connect to
active avionics. The running joke about TDR is that it requires
a Ph.D. to use.
Standing-wave reflectometry (SWR) involves sending a
sinusoidal waveform down the wire. A reflected sinusoid is
returned from the wire's end, and the two signals add to a
standing wave on the line. The peaks and nulls of this standing
wave give information on the length and terminating load of
the cable; a healthy line's wave pattern will be distinct
from that of a line with an open or short circuit. The edge
this method has over TDR is that the electronics are simpler
and therefore less expensive.
Like SWR,
frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) uses sine waves. FDR,
though, directly measures the phase difference between the
incident and reflected waves; any faults in the line will
generate resonances between the two signals. This method is
being developed for in situ wire testing by researchers
at Utah State University with support from Management Sciences
Inc., Albuquerque, N.M., and the Naval Air Systems Command.
The goal is to allow preflight testing of cables with the
touch of a button, and without the risk of damaging the cables
by disconnecting them.
On the horizon
Because of the shortcomings
in the above techniques, researchers are now looking at several
new technologies. These include automated reflectometry testing;
smart wire systems for real-time, on-the-spot testing; and,
in the event of an in-flight failure, advanced fire suppression
methods and arc-fault circuit breakers.
Automating
the reflectometry methods now in use may one day mean that
maintenance workers will be able to gauge a cable's health
with minimal physical intervention. A hand-held unit would
clamp around the wire, rather than directly connecting to
it. Recently, a fully automated TDR unit was developed by
Phoenix Aviation and Technology. It provides a wider range
of fault diagnostics and prognostics, with precise location
and interpretation of the fault. The same software can be
easily embedded into application-specific IC format or similar
small computing platforms, thus paving the way for real-time
embedded conductor monitoring.
All the
same, reflectometry is pushing the state of the art when it
comes to finding small insulation cracks, detecting chafed
insulation before arcs occur, and locating an arc's source.
Better detection of these tiny anomalies may be achievable
by wetting the cable with water or saline solution, or filling
the plane with inert gas.
Perhaps
the maintenance worker's greatest nightmare is finding faults
that come and go. These so-called ticking faults arise from
vibration, temperature change, moisture, g-forces, electromagnetic
interference, and so on. Diagnosing the problem requires systems
that can function in flight, where ticking faults usually
occur.
Smart wire
systems are thus being designed for testing cables continuously,
both before takeoff and during a flight. Systems now under
development include a frequency domain reflectometer, on-board
processor, environmental sensors, and wireless communication
system integrated into a single miniaturized unit, hundreds
of which can be embedded in the wiring system. They will monitor
the health of the cable and guide cable maintenance, and even
detect any faults that occur and correct them in real time.
For the
aircraft being designed today, a
novel kind of wiring with a complete array of embedded
sensors is being proposed. This is particularly critical for
long-lived planes such as the Joint Strike Fighter. Weight
and space constraints are likely to drive this technology
to nanoscale sensors, emerging material science technologies,
and microelectromechanical system devices.
Of course,
wire failures will still occur. New technologies that can
help limit the damage in such an event include arc-fault circuit
breakers and fire suppression methods.
Smart wire systems will continuously monitor the cable's
health and correct faults as they occur
Ordinary
circuit breakers are heat-sensitive bimetal elements that
trip only when a large current passes through the circuit
long enough to heat the element. This power may be on the
order of 1000 percent of the rated current for 0.35 to 0.8
seconds. By comparison, a single arc fault may last only 1.25
ms, and a series of events may last 20–30 ms. Too fleeting
to trip the circuit breaker, these arc faults can nonetheless
cause catastrophic local damage to the wire. Fires have been
known to break out with the breaker still intact.
Arc-fault
circuit breakers contain sophisticated electronics to sample
the current on the wire at submillisecond intervals. Both
time and frequency domain filtering are used to extract the
arc-fault signature from the current waveform. This signature
may be integrated over time to discriminate, by means of pattern-matching
algorithms, between a normal current and a sputtering arc-fault
current. And so ordinary transients, due to, say, a motor
being turned on and off, can be distinguished from the random
current surges that occur with arcing.
Arc-fault
breakers are already required in new home wiring in the United
States and are now being miniaturized for use on aircraft.
Normally these breakers either are used in tandem with a traditional
heat-sensitive breaker or else include a heat-sensitive element
in addition to the pattern-matching electronics. Ideally,
circuitry will also be added to locate the fault after the
breaker has tripped.
Once a fire
starts on an aircraft, it spreads rapidly, aided by Mylar-backed
insulation in the cabin walls, limited access to fire extinguishers,
and so on. New extinguisher designs that rely on super-fine,
high-pressure mists of water, inert gases, and other techniques
are now being developed to put out all types of aircraft fires,
including those due to faulty wiring.
Amazingly
little is known about how and why wires age, but polymer scientists
are making up for lost time. Among other things, they are
studying the chemical and physical changes and resultant effects
on electrical insulation properties that occur as wires age.
One goal is to find new materials to replace copper wiring
in signal-transfer and electromagnetic interference shielding
on aircraft, as well as new types of wire insulation that
resist chafing and have extended life and built-in diagnostics.
Not to panic
If you happen to
read this article while flying, do not panic. Few wiring problems
end in disaster. There is cause for concern, though, as the
air fleet continues to age, and our reliance on air transport
grows. While an aircraft's other major systems undergo preflight
testing and regular inspection and maintenance, its central
nervous system--wiring--has been long neglected. Sorely needed
are new maintenance methods that account for the aging of
wires, as is done for aging structural and computer systems.
Diagnosis
is good. Prognosis is better. And prevention is better still.
This last may require a new way of thinking for electrical
engineers, who tend to be more at home with obsolescence than
geriatrics. For aging aircraft wiring, diagnostics and prevention
are improving, and prognostics are on the horizon. What remains
to be seen is how all of these methods will be implemented
in practical systems, so that disasters like TWA 800 and Swissair
111 can be prevented.
Spectrum editor: Jean Kumagai

PHOTO: PETE MCARTHUR
link to "Smart
Wiring"
|
 |