Swiss To Launch Crossair Crash Probe
Tuesday February 17, 2004
Reuters

US To Boost Aircraft Fuel Tank Safety

US regulators said Tuesday they plan to order modifications on 3,800 commercial jets to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion like the one that destroyed TWA Flight 800 in 1996.

The initiative, once dismissed as impractical and too expensive, could cost the industry at least USD$530 million over several years, the Federal Aviation Administration said.

"Many people said it couldn't be done," said FAA Administrator Marion Blakey. "Our people have really brought us to a breakthrough on virtually eliminating fuel tank explosions on aircraft like the one that brought down TWA 800."

In that case, investigators concluded an electrical short ignited fuel vapors in the center wing tank of the older model Boeing 747. The plane exploded over the Atlantic off New York's Long Island, killing all 230 people aboard.

Blakey said the FAA will propose a rule later this year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device on new planes made by Boeing and Airbus and retrofit existing aircraft over a seven year period.

The device is designed to reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing potentially volatile fuel-air

 mixtures in empty or emptying tanks. This is achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air.

Certain models, like the Boeing 747 and 737 and the Airbus A320, will likely be modified first, regulators said.

FAA plans follow years of piecemeal regulation aimed almost entirely at mitigating potential ignition sources like wiring.

"We've known throughout that we've needed to address fuel tank flammability itself and this has proven to be a greater challenge," Blakey said.

Boeing designed its system and conducted flight tests last summer and plans more next month. European-based Airbus has been further behind in developing its system.

Airbus spokesman David Venz said the manufacturer had no comment on the FAA's plans. "We've been saying the same thing since TWA 800 -- we have a completely different design from those tanks that have had problems."

But following the lead of French authorities, the FAA proposed in November that US airlines modify wiring on probes that measure fuel quantity on 468 Airbus A319 and A320 planes.

Boeing spokeswoman Liz Verdier said the manufacturer will not wait for new FAA regulation to become final before starting work. "We're doing it anyway," Verdier said.

Boeing wants to roll out the first 747-400 with the fuel tank enhancement at the end of 2005 and plans to make retrofit kits available to airlines at the same time or soon after.

(Reuters)


FAA to Order Fuel Safety Systems on Jets
FAA to Order Airlines to Install New Fuel Tank System to Reduce Chance of Explosion

The Associated Press


WASHINGTON Feb. 17 — The government will order airlines to install a system to reduce the chance of fuel tank explosions like the one that downed a TWA Boeing 747 in 1996, Federal Aviation Administration chief Marion Blakey said Tuesday.

The decision affects about 3,800 Boeing and Airbus aircraft operated by domestic airlines.

Click Here

In the past 14 years there have been three fuel tank explosions, including the TWA accident, resulting in 346 deaths. Blakey said the new device could eliminate up to four accidents over the next 25 years.

"We have a plan that will virtually eliminate fuel tank explosions aboard aircraft," Blakey said at a news conference.

A cost-benefit analysis still must be done and airlines need time to plan for the change, so the requirement is not expected to take effect for at least two years. Once the rule is issued, the so-called fuel-tank inerting program will be phased in over seven years. During that time existing planes will have to be retrofitted with the device and new planes will have them as standard equipment.

Some jetliners may be fitted with the systems before they're required. Jim Proulx, Boeing spokesman, said the company plans to start producing new planes and retrofitting existing ones late next year.

TWA Flight 800 crashed off the coast of Long Island, N.Y., on July 17, 1996, killing all 230 people aboard. The National Transportation Safety Board blamed the accident on an explosion, saying vapors in a partly empty fuel tank probably were ignited by a spark in the wiring.

The accident prompted FAA scientists to step up research aimed at eliminating potential ignition sources for such explosions and reducing the flammability of vapors in fuel tanks.

They came up with a way to make fuel vapors less likely to ignite. The system pumps air flowing from the aircraft engine into yard-long, 8-inch-wide canisters. A ropelike substance in the canisters filters oxygen and water from the air. The resulting nitrogen-rich mixture, which is much less likely to combust than normal air, is pumped into fuel tanks. The filtered oxygen and water is dumped off the aircraft.

Though the new system probably wouldn't be fitted onto all planes that need it until 2013, the FAA has already ordered airlines to make 60 changes to eliminate possible ignition sources, Blakey said.

For example, in 2002 the FAA told airlines to replace fuel pumps that have faulty wiring. The agency also ordered airlines to fly certain model jetliners with extra fuel to prevent fuel pumps from overheating.

But the government might not have identified all the ways a spark could possibly ignite fuel, Blakey said. The new system would add a safety net by making it nearly impossible for fuel to explode.

NTSB Chairman Ellen Engleman-Conners said the new system is essential.

"Ignition-source prevention alone cannot protect transport airplanes from this potential danger," Engleman-Conners said in a statement. "The issue of fuel flammability had to be confronted."

The FAA estimates the cost between $600 million and $700 million, Blakey said, or between $140,000 and $220,000 per aircraft.

In 2001, a government-industry task force concluded it would be too expensive up to $20 billion to retrofit airliners with the equipment necessary to pump nonflammable nitrogen into fuel tanks.

But Ivor Thomas, a former Boeing scientist who went to work for the FAA, made several research breakthroughs within the past two years that allowed FAA scientists to develop a cheaper, simpler solution.

The FAA thought it was necessary to reduce the oxygen to 9 percent of the air siphoned from aircraft engines into fuel tanks. Thomas discovered that oxygen only needed to be reduced to 12 percent. The air we breathe is 21 percent oxygen.

Thomas also discovered that nitrogen would remain in the fuel tank, which eliminated the need for a compressor to force it to stay.

Some airlines, such as Southwest and JetBlue, will be affected more than others by the rule because their fleets are made up entirely of Boeing or Airbus jets.

Others, like Northwest and American, have a number of jetliners made by McDonnell-Douglas that won't require retrofitting.

 
CNN logo
navigation

Search


Main banner
rule

TWA probe exposes questions of

empty fuel tank safety

planes

NTSB proposal calls for measures to guard against explosions

November 15, 1996
Web posted at: 5:15 a.m. EST

From Correspondent Christine Negroni

NEW YORK (CNN) -- The investigation into the crash of TWA Flight 800 is leading some National Transportation Safety Board investigators to call for new measures guarding against potential fuel tank explosions, CNN has learned.

Even though the cause of the TWA flight is still a mystery, some investigators say it may be possible to prevent similar disasters in the future.

The idea revives a 25-year-old debate about how to prevent explosions in fuel tanks. Airlines commonly fly with empty or nearly empty fuel tanks that under certain circumstances can become explosive.

wreckage

The NTSB has created a draft proposal to address what one investigator calls "the possibility of aircraft blowing up in flight."

The draft recommends that steps be taken to reduce the combustibility of jet fuel fumes in these tanks, CNN has learned.

It's a safety problem which may involve thousands of commercial aircraft built by a number of manufacturers.

As many airplanes do, investigators say TWA Flight 800 took off with only 50 to 100 gallons of fuel in its center tank. They say fumes in the tank were heated to above the temperature at which they become explosive, dooming the 747. What's not known is why the center fuel tank exploded.

Other deadly crashes cited in the proposal are the crash of a Philippine Airlines 737 in 1990 in which eight people died and the crash of a 1989 727 that was blown out of the sky in Colombia by a bomb. Some investigators believe the Colombia bomb would not have brought down the plane had it not ignited an empty fuel tank.

crash site

"Empty fuel tanks have fumes on board, and when they explode they cause massive damage," said Michael Hynes, a former NTSB crash investigator.

Boeing acknowledges that fuel tanks can become highly volatile, but insists they're safe because they're isolated from anything that could ignite them.

The current fuel system design emerged from discussions among federal agencies and aircraft manufacturers in the 1970s. Yet some experts doubt the solution is 100 percent dependable.

plane

"The problem with one in a billion is you don't know whether it's going to be the first time or the second time and then have 999 million uneventful flights," Hynes said. "Anything is possible."

One investigator familiar with the draft says the proposal takes into account that some terrorists know "a small bomb in the right place can initiate an explosion powerful enough to destroy an aircraft."

The fact that the proposal is being considered seems to bolster what one senior investigator on the TWA 800 team claims: No matter what the initial source of ignition, the volatile brew in the fuel tank all but guaranteed no one would survive the crash.

rule

 

Special Section:

Related stories:

Related site:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
rule
What You Think Tell us what you think!

You said it...
rule


To the top

© 1996 Cable News Network, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.

 

  

Return to Latest Additions