General
Description
Foamex Polyurethane Safety Foam
has a 30 year record, built on combat experience, of
suppressing explosions in military aircraft and land
vehicles. It adds minimal weight, reducing usable fuel
by less than 4%. Because it is a passive,
maintenance-free system, Safety Foam is always active,
allowing the pilot or operator to concentrate on his
primary assignment. This increases the survivability of
the air-craft or vehicle. Safety Foam is a fully
reticulated, flexible polyurethane foam composed of a
skeletal matrix of tiny lightweight interconnecting
strands. These act as a three dimensional fire screen.
The material is a passive, self healing, explosion
suppression system capable of withstanding multiple
hits. It is always on guard — no gauges to check, no
leaks, no mechanical malfunctions. Foamex Polyurethane
Safety Foam is a combat proven system, refined from
experience, that will help prevent fuel explosions
caused by:
- Gunfire
- Electrical Ignition
- Lightning Strike
- Static Discharge
Proven Success Through
Evolutionary Development
Early Development—The United
States Air Force has successfully used Foamex
Polyurethane Safety Foam to suppress fuel tank
explosions in combat and special mission aircraft since
1965. The original concept of fully packed Safety Foam
(Type I, orange) reduced fuel volume by 4% (displacement
and surface fuel retention) and increased net weight
approximately 0.08 lb. per gallon of tankage compared
with today’s designs that increase net weight only 0.03
lb. per gallon or less in gross voided systems.
|
Foamex Polyurethane Safety Foam Functions: |
-
Fuel Tank Inerting
-
Slosh Attenuation (Baffling)
-
Dry Bay Explosion Suppression
-
Foreign Object Debris
(FOD) Barrier
-
Electrostatic Suppression
in Fuel Tanks
|
Lighter Weight Safety Foam—In
1970, Foamex developed lower density Type II (yellow)
and Type III (red) polyester polyurethane Safety Foams.
Type III’s finer pore size enabled the use of gross
voiding techniques. The foam’s lighter weight, combined
with new voiding techniques, offered a weight reduction
of up to 25% and, depending on the voiding method used,
lowered fuel displacement and fuel retention. Compared
to the original fully packed (Type I, orange) technique,
the new development allowed customers to reduce foam use
by up to 70%.
Longer Life—In
1974, the United States Air Force, in conjunction with
Scott Paper Company (Foamex Technical Products Group’s
previous parent company), initiated the development of
new polyether Safety Foams. The new polyether
polyurethanes, offer substantially better hydrolytic
stability than polyester type foams and increased
service life. Since these foams could exceed the
expected service life of many aircraft, the use of
polyether Safety Foam can eliminate the cost of foam
retrofitting often necessary with polyester Safety
Foams.
Conductive Safety Foam—Beginning
in late 1980, the Air Force began to experience a series
of static ignitions in A-10 and C-130 aircraft. While no
aircraft were lost or serious injuries sustained, there
was mounting concern over the increasing number of
ignitions reported and the maintenance time required to
replace burned or scorched foam.
Foamex and the U.S.A.F. spent
extensive time investigating the problem and determined
that the electrical resistivity of Type IV and V blue
polyether polyurethane foam was one of the contributing
factors.
Responding to customer’s needs,
Foamex Technical Products Group developed the first
state-of-the-art conductive foam for use in fuel cells.
So unique was this material, Type VI and VII CSF 204
Beige Conductive Safety Foam, that the company was
awarded U.S. patent 4,578,406 for the new concept.
Foamex Polyether Polyurethane
Conductive Foams have been 100% successful in solving
the electrostatic ignition problem. From 1988–1994,
Foamex developed black and dark grey FSX and FSX2
(Inherently Conductive Safety Foam), to meet the
demanding Class 1 environmental conditions of 0°F.
Lower Cost—Recent
studies have substantiated that improved manufacturing
techniques provide safety foam products that exhibit up
to 50% less fuel retention than the maximum allowable in
MIL-B-83054B and MIL-F-87260. This means that Foamex
Safety Foam, together with the latest gross voiding
techniques, provides a cost-effective product compared
to earlier types. Also from a weight/volume penalty
aspect, the new polyether polyurethane Safety Foams
should provide an overall system that offers equal or
lower life cycle costs than complex OBIGGS, (On-Board
Inerting Gas Generating Systems) or other gas systems
such as the LN2 (liquid nitrogen) with its ground
logistics requirements.
As quoted from Air Force Wright
Patterson Aeronautical Report AFWAL-TR- 85-2060, "Life
Cycle Cost Analysis, based on best available data and
projections, revealed that the OBIGGS costs would be
about seven times higher than foam, that foam would be
comparable to liquid nitrogen systems, and would be
one-third the cost of Halon Systems." Safety Foam is the
clear cut, cost-effective choice!
Foamex Safety Foam: A
Passive System, Always on Guard
Safety Foam is always there,
always "turned on," and has the following advantages:
- No moving parts
- Nothing to turn on or off
- No pressure lines
- No pressure relief valves
- No explosion sensing
devices
- No functional components
to fail, maintain or monitor other than periodic
inspection
- No pilot distraction
- No need to handle the
logistics of large quantities of LN2 and the special
safety requirements during refueling
- No failure modes if
properly installed
- No corrosion from powders
- No metal mesh to leave
filings that plug filters and injectors
- No onboard high pressure
storage vessels to protect
Safety Foam is a passive
security system, always there to reduce vulnerability
and increase survivability. The new Foamex Polyether
Urethane Foams are easier to install (pack) in fuel
tanks than the earlier foams because their volume swell
characteristics permit the undersizing of foam
components. When fuel wetted, the foam swells
approximately 6% - 12% by volume to completely fill the
tank cavity.
Foamex Polyurethane Safety
Foam Attenuates Fuel Sloshing
As a surge mitigator, it
attentuates sloshing fuel and in some cases eliminates
the need for structural baffles in the tank. Safety Foam
gives the fuel a smooth sine wave motion and helps
prevent sudden redistribution of mass. It acts as a
hydrodynamic ram suppressor reducing the possibility of
fuel cell rupture.
Foamex Polyurethane Safety
Foam Acts as a Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Barrier
As a lightweight, easy to
install barrier, the skeletal foam structure acts as a
natural roughing filter; it can prevent the movement of
loose debris from one compartment to another inside the
fuel system. The wetting characteristics of reticulated
foams (open pore) are a function of porosity; a finer
pore size will retain more fluid than a coarse pore foam
at a constant density. The finer pore foams, (Type III,
Type V and Type VII), are designed for use where total
tank voiding exceeds 40% by volume. Finer pore size
foams offer improved inerting performance, when
combustion, void volume, foam thickness, and initial
pressure limits are not exceeded.
Foamex Safety Foam Offers
Easy Installation
A comparison demonstrates
increased volume swell (in fuel) characteristics of
polyether polyurethane Safety Foams. In practice this
can create new efficiencies in packing (installation)
since these foams may be installed slightly undersized
(2% to 4% lineal) into fuel tanks. When fuel wetted, the
foam expands to full fuel tank configuration size.
Safety Foam can be fabricated into parts of various
shapes and sizes for installation into intricately
shaped fuel tanks. It can be easily fabricated to fit
around sensors, vents, and other fuel tank hardware.
Also Foamex Polyurethane Safety Foam is currently in
wide use with flexible bladder tankage systems.
Conductive Safety Foam—
State-of-the-Art
With Foamex’s introduction of
state-of-the-art Conductive Safety Foams, the problems
and concerns of electrostatic ignitions are a thing of
the past. The product has been fleet tested in military
aircraft, such as the C-130, P-3L, and A-10, under the
most severe Arctic conditions. Not a single instance of
aircraft static ignition has been reported since the
inception of critical testing in 1986.
New Black FSX Type VI and
Dark Gray Type VII Conductive Safety
Foam offers maximum benefits
and protection:
- Virtually no electrical
activity in temperatures from -30oF to
+160oF.
- Greater service life — an
accelerated aging laboratory hydrolysis test
indicates a potential life of 5 to 10 times that of
polyester polyurethane foams, and equal to polyether
polyurethane foams. Aircraft with Foamex polyether
polyurethane foam have now been flying for 19 years
without a reported instance of foam failure due to
hydrolysis.
- Greater low temperature
flexibility than polyester-based urethane foams.
- Anti-fungal
characteristics as part of the conductive treatment
an option.
- Ballistic and flame tube
testing indicate that polyether-based urethanes are
equal to polyester foams of the same pore size and
density in explosion suppression characteristics.
MIL-B-83054B
Foamex polyurethane Safety Foam
Types I, II, III, IV and V all meet the requirements of
Military Specification, "Baffle and Inerting Material,
Aircraft Fuel Tank" MIL-B-83054B and Amendment 2 dated 7
March 1984.
MIL-F-87260 (U.S.A.F.)
New Foamex FSX and FSX 2 (Types
VI, VII) Inherently Conductive Polyurethane Class 1
Safety Foam meets all the requirements of military
specification MIL-F-87260 titled "Foam Material,
Explosion Suppression, Inherently Conductive, for
Aircraft Fuel Tank and Dry Bay Areas," dated 7 February
1992. "Reticulated Polyurethane Foam Explosion
Suppression Material for Fuel Systems and Dry Bays."
Copies of MIL-B-83054B and MIL-F-87260 in their entirety
can be ordered free of charge from the Naval
Publications and Forms Center, Philadelphia, PA 19120.
SAE AIR-4170
Complete guidelines for
installation and other Technical Data reported by the
Society of Automotive Engineers are available from SAE
International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA
15096-0001, Telephone (412) 776-4841.
Other Uses:
Foamex polyurethane Safety Foam has been used in the
flexible bladder-type fuel tanks of racing cars to
reduce surge, to improve handling, and to help prevent
explosion in serious crashes. In boats, Safety Foam is
used for baffling in fuel tanks to reduce fuel surge and
slosh, thereby significantly improving performance. It
also is used to provide traditional explosion
suppression protection. Safety Foam is used in special
purpose aircraft to reduce fuel surge in stunt and
agricultural dusting craft, and to help protect against
possible explosion from lightning strikes on weather
reconnaissance planes. Foamex polyurethane Safety Foam
is used in stationary fuel storage tanks and sumps to
reduce the risk of explosion. Other applications include
flashback protection in gasoline can filler spouts.
Safety Foam has been used for discrete armored vehicles,
presidential limousines, military wheeled and tracked
vehicles, as well as in service station island pumps.
Comparison of Physical Properties and
Characteristics
Mil-B-83054-B |
| |
Type IV |
Type V |
Type VI |
Type VII |
|
Color |
dark blue |
light blue |
dark black |
light grey |
|
Polyol type |
polyether |
polyether |
polyether |
polyether |
|
Density range (lbs/ft3) |
1.20-1.45 |
1.20-1.45 |
1.20-1.50 |
1.20-1.50 |
|
Pore size (ppi) |
8-18 |
20-30 |
7.5-21.0 |
21.5-33.0 |
|
Air pressure drop (inches of water) |
0.14-0.23 |
0.25-0.33 |
0.15-0.25 |
0.26-0.36 |
|
Tensile strength (psi) min |
10.0 |
15.0 |
10.0 |
15.0 |
|
Ultimate elongation (%) min |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
Tear resistance (pli) min |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
50% compression set (%) max |
30 |
30 |
45 |
45 |
|
Compression load deflection |
|
|
|
|
|
25% deflection (psi) min |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
|
65% deflection (psi) min |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
|
Fuel displacement with JP-5 (max vol %) |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
Fuel retention of JP-5 (max vol %) |
2.5 |
4.5 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
|
Volume increase |
|
|
|
|
|
JP-4 jet fuel |
0-25.0 |
0-25.0 |
0-25.0 |
0-25.0 |
|
Type III fluid |
0-40.0 |
0-40.0 |
0-40.0 |
0-40.0 |
|
Horizontal flammability (inches/min) max |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
|
Extractable materials (wt %) max |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Low temperature flexibility |
no cracking or breaking of strands |
|
Entrained solid contamination (mg/ft3)
max |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
|
Steam autoclave exposure, 250°F, 10 hrs |
|
|
|
|
|
tensile loss (%) max |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
|
Electrical resistivity at 75°F (ohm-cm) 1x10 |
1x1015 |
1x1015 |
5x1011 |
5x1011 |
Polyester Grades Also Available |
|