TWO airliners carrying a
total of 500 passengers came within seconds of
colliding because of a flaw in the radar system
used by air traffic controllers, according to a
safety investigation.
A controller mistakenly ordered a United
Airlines jet to descend into the path of a
British Airways aircraft after becoming confused
by overlapping labels on his radar screen. The
labels show each aircraft’s call sign, its
height and the airport to which it is heading.
The aircraft, both Boeing 777s, were bound
for Heathrow but had been directed into a
holding pattern over Chesham in Buckinghamshire,
known as the “Bovingdon stack”. There were so
many aircraft in the stack that the controller,
based at West Drayton, near Heathrow, was unable
to distinguish between them.
He mistook another aircraft at 12,000ft for
the BA aircraft which was at 13,000ft. He then
ordered the United Airlines aircraft to descend
to 13,000ft into what he wrongly believed was
empty airspace. Within 40 seconds, the vertical
distance between the two planes had reduced to
only 600ft, breaching the minimum safety gap of
1,000ft.
The aircraft would have come much closer if
it had not been for the collision avoidance
system on the BA jet which ordered the pilot to
dive.
An alarm on the controller’s desk also began
buzzing and he ordered the United Airlines
aircraft to climb. But the close proximity of
other planes in the stack meant there
was little room in which to recover. Other
aircraft received a series of collision alerts
in a “domino effect” which rippled down the
stack.
A report by the UK Airprox Board, which
investigates near misses, found that the problem
of overlapping labels had been previously
identified by National Air Traffic Services (NATS)
following an incident over
Romford in Essex in which an aircraft could not
be identified after vanishing from the screen
behind another.
The board found that the problem of overlap
in the incident over Chesham had been heightened
by the size of the airspace being monitored by
the controller. Normally, controllers cover only
one sector measuring 45 miles across, but the
area is widened if not enough staff are
available. On this occasion the controller was
covering 65 miles of airspace.
The report concluded: “The avoiding action by
the controller did little to take the heat out
of the situation. Normal traffic flow had been
compromised to the extent that safety had not
been assured.”
The incident, on December 1 last year,
happened shortly after 6am when about 30
aircraft were being held in four stacks on the
outskirts of London.
Air traffic controllers are under intense
pressure between 6am and 7am because airlines
try to squeeze in as many flights as possible
immediately after the noise restrictions at
Heathrow are lifted at 6am. Many aircraft arrive
over London just before 6am and spend up to 45
minutes circling before being given permission
to land.
John Stewart, chairman of ClearSkies, which
campaigns on behalf of people living under
flight paths, called for a system of penalties
to deter airlines from arriving so early that
they had to be sent to a stack. He added: “It is
bad enough that people living under the stacks
get woken up by circling aircraft in the early
morning without the added risk of a mid-air
collision over their homes.”
A spokesman for NATS said a recent software
upgrade had reduced the problem of overlapping
and the system at West Drayton would be further
upgraded by December next year. The controller
involved in the near miss had been suspended but
was allowed to return to work after re-training.
The number of near misses involving aircraft
in Britain’s skies last year fell to a record
low of 181, compared with 221 in 2002. But the
risk for commercial airliners rose slightly from
0.51 incidents per 100,000 flying hours in 2002
to 0.79 in 2003.
from
link