Was This an Incursion?
Posted on Thu, Apr. 15, 2004

 

Air-Traffic Alarm Averts a Possible Disaster at Newark, N.J., Airport


By Daniel Sforza, The Record, Hackensack, N.J. Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News

 

An aircraft on approach to Newark Liberty International Airport tried this week to land on a runway where a plane was waiting to take off, marking the second such incident in little more than a month.

The planes in both episodes set off a radar warning system that alerted air traffic controllers and allowed them to reroute the incoming planes. Both occurred on days when the airport was socked in by cloudy, rainy weather.

"We never saw him," Newark air traffic controller Russ Halleran said of the most recent incident, which took place Tuesday. "We visually never saw him. The equipment worked. Thank God we had it."

On Tuesday morning, bad weather had lowered the ceiling to about 400 feet and visibility was about one mile. Around 7 a.m., Air Transport International Flight 816 dropped through the clouds and lined up for a landing on Runway 4-left.

"I was standing behind the controller working and all of a sudden the ... zero alert blows off; it says runway 4-left is occupied," Halleran said. "The pilot was basically chasing for the wrong runway. He was definitely going to land on 4-left if we didn't get him to come around."

And that could have been potentially deadly for the passengers on a Continental Boeing 737 that was sitting on the runway waiting to take off.

Instead, controllers had the Air Transport International DC-8 circle and land on another runway.

Halleran said the planes were within a quarter-mile of each other and about 200 feet from each other vertically. Federal Aviation Administration officials said the planes did not come close enough to warrant classifying the incident as an "incursion," in which planes come too close to planes or vehicles on the runway.

Newark had three incursions in 2003 and two in 2002, according to FAA figures. Nationwide, incursions dropped to 324 in 2003 from 339 in 2002.

However, the National Transportation Safety Board has kept the runway incursions on its "most wanted" safety improvement list, saying the numbers nationwide are still too high.

The FAA has worked to modernize its equipment to provide a greater measure of runway safety, but controllers say proposed cuts in the agency's budget could hurt that progress.

"Our funds are going down, and we still have equipment like this we need to put on line," Halleran said. "Not having money for new controllers, staffing or equipment, it's an ugly scenario."

On days such as Tuesday, when bad weather has enveloped the airport, controllers lose the ability to visually spot planes from their 335-foot-high perch in the control tower. Instead, they rely on a bank of radar systems to tell them what is coming and what is going.

The system that alerted controllers to Tuesday's situation is called AMASS, or Airport Movement Area Safety System.

The system works by taking data from the airport's various radar systems and using it to determine potential conflicts based on the position, velocity, and acceleration of aircraft in the sky and on the ground.

"AMASS was installed to enhance safety, particularly in weather like we had [Tuesday]," said FAA spokeswoman Arlene Salac. "It's a safety enhancement. Nothing can replace the job the controllers do, but it's a tool that enhances the level of safety."

The system also proved its mettle on March 6 at Newark Liberty, when it helped controllers reroute an inbound cargo plane that also was lined up with the incorrect runway where a British Airways plane stood waiting to take off.

The FAA began deploying the AMASS system in 2001, and it is now at Newark Liberty, Kennedy International, and La Guardia airports. However, not all airports nationwide have the system, Salac said.

More From The Star-Ledger

New Jersey

Averting problems on runways in Newark

 
 
Friday, April 16, 2004
BY RON MARSICO
Star-Ledger Staff

At Newark Liberty International Airport's new control tower, the latest aviation warning system was installed last year as part of a $139 million federal program to safeguard the nation's busiest airports.

The Airport Movement Area Safety System is supposed to prevent incoming planes from hitting aircraft taxiing for departure.

Until last month, the technology was not put to the ultimate test.

But twice now AMASS has helped prevent mishaps at Newark Airport involving passenger jets and incoming cargo planes, according to air traffic control and Federal Aviation Administration officials.

At 7:06 a.m. Tuesday amid bad weather, a Continental Express regional jet was set to depart Runway 4 Left, one of Newark's major runways. At the same time, an Air Transport International cargo plane was cleared to land on Runway 4 Right, said Arlene Salac, an FAA spokeswoman.

But Salac said the Air Transport pilot mistakenly lined up with Runway 4 Left after coming through the 400-foot cloud cover, causing AMASS to sound an alarm in Newark Airport's tower and prompt a controller to immediately radio the pilot.

The pilot aborted the landing and came around for another try.

"It could have been really ugly, needless to say," said Russ Halleran, president of the air traffic controllers local union.

"He (the pilot) must have just come out of the clouds, saw a runway and went for that runway," said Halleran, calling AMASS a critical technology. "Weatherwise, we couldn't see anything."

The AMASS alarm is actually an automated voice telling the controller that the runway is already occupied.

Jim Hobson, CEO of the Arkansas-based Air Transport, said he was not aware of the incident involving his company's plane but would review the matter.

AMASS was developed after a February 1991 crash that killed 34 people in Los Angeles when an air traffic controller directed a commuter plane to a runway for takeoff and allowed a jet to land on the same runway. Beginning in 2001, the systems have been installed at the nation's 34 busiest airports, and before this year were credited with preventing four major accidents.

The system works by reviewing data from an airport's radar and provides visual and audio alerts to controllers when it senses the possibility of a runway collision.

"It's designed to be the eyes for the controller when the weather is like this (cloudy and rainy)," Salac said.

On March 6 -- again under poor weather -- at Newark Airport, AMASS visually alerted controllers when a cargo plane tried to land on a runway where British Airways Flight 189 was preparing for takeoff.

That time, according to Salac and Halleran, the AMASS alarm did not sound, but a controller saw the visual alert on the system's screen and sent the cargo plane around for another landing attempt. The controller received a commendation.

Salac said that while the pilots in both cases lined up with the wrong runway, the AMASS system worked and the matters were not classified by the FAA as incidents that need to be investigated.

"AMASS did its job," said Pasquale DiFulco, a spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates Newark Airport. "And we will continue to work diligently to identify ways to enhance safety measures at our airports."

Ron Marsico covers Newark Airport. He can be reached at rmarsico@starledger.com or (973) 392-7860.
from link and link
 

to Latest Additions