OR SEARCH
PROFILE
Use Mine
Change Mine
|
|
BRUCE D. NORDWALL/WASHINGTON
The traffic-alert and collision
avoidance system (TCAS), somewhat maligned and misunderstood in the wake
of the July 1 midair collision in Europe, provides more protection than
is commonly understood.
HONEYWELL |
| The
pilot's perspective in the white aircraft is shown in sequence,
from left to right in the top row, and then bottom row. A stand-alone
TCAS instrument is shown, but the display would be the same
on an Electronic Flight Information System, or glass cockpit.
In the far left display, (Non-Threat Traffic) RNG 10
is the range displayed from own aircraft (blue cross) to the
edge of the white circle. The other non-threat aircraft (white
diamond, open center) is 200 ft. higher (+02). Proximity
Traffic: The other aircraft is closer (white diamond, white
center) and still 200 ft. higher. A Traffic Advisory
is given when other aircraft (yellow circle) is within 48 sec.
of closest point of approach (CPA), still 200 ft. higher. Resolution
Advisory--about 35 sec. before CPA--aircraft is a red square,
relative altitude (+200 ft.) is in red, and the vertical speed
indicator is green for the commanded descent (between 1,500
and 2,000 fpm.), with red showing that any climb or descent
less than 1,500 fpm. is wrong. Descent Established:The
pilot has established a descent with white needle in the green
area, and vertical separation has increased to 400 ft. Softening
Command:With 600-ft. separation showing in red, the pilot
is directed to ease the descent rate to between 0 and 500 fpm.
down. Level Off: The white arrow shows the aircraft is
level, red number shows threat is 700 ft. above, and aircraft
symbol is still red. Clear of Conflict: As the aircraft
pass, with 700-ft. separation in the example, the target symbol
returns to yellow circle indicating proximity traffic. At this
time the pilots should notify ATC of the deviation and return
to their assigned altitude. |
Pilots generally have a high regard for TCAS, and its European
counterpart ACAS (airborne collision avoidance system). From the cockpit
they are perceived as a safety net when the air traffic control system
fails to provide safe separation.
HOWEVER, CONTROL-
LERS have some reservations, largely because they have no way of
knowing what TCAS may be telling flight crews, and they are concerned
about the results if there is a conflict between the dictates of a human
(controller) and machine (TCAS), as appears to have happened in this
accident. Reports of the mishap say that the DHL Boeing 757 pilots
followed TCAS commands to descend, but the Russian pilots of the
Bashkirian Airlines Tupolev Tu-154 did not respond to ACAS commands to
climb, instead following the controller's order to descend.
TCAS will give protective warnings even from the approach of a non-TCAS-equipped
aircraft, or one whose TCAS is not working, so long as it has an
operating transponder. What is lost if both aircraft are not equipped
with TCAS or ACAS is the ability of the two systems to communicate
intentions.
A TCAS-equipped aircraft approaching within 20-48 sec. of another
aircraft, within 10,000 ft. of its altitude, will receive a traffic
advisory (TA) with both an aural and symbolic "Traffic, Traffic" alert,
and a visual indication of the vertical separation. If they continue to
converge, the pilot of the TCAS aircraft will get a resolution advisory
(RA) directing him to descend or climb. If both aircraft have TCAS, they
will communicate to avoid mirror-image maneuvers.
TCAS commands avoidance maneuvers only in the vertical plane. When
one aircraft's TCAS tells its pilots, "Descend, Descend," it also
directs the other TCAS aircraft to remain level or climb. With the
currently mandated systems (TCAS-II with version 7.0 software and
ACAS-II), if a descending aircraft detects the other also in a descent,
it will make a dynamic adjustment and direct the pilots to reverse the
maneuver: "Climb, Climb."
THE PRECEDING TCAS-II, in use in the U.S. since 1994
employingversion 6.04 software, could make a dynamic reversal when a
TCAS-equipped aircraft encountered a non-TCAS aircraft that made a
mirror maneuver. But it had a quirk when such a conflict occurred
between two TCAS aircraft. If they were both descending to avoid
contact, the algorithms could tell one to further increase its descent
rate, but could not tell it to reverse and climb. The7.0 software
introduced in 1999 and mandated in March 2001 has the capability to
adjust, according to Tom Staggs, formerly Honeywell's business manager
for TCAS.
Honeywell is one of three manufacturers of TCAS-II, building the
system developed by AlliedSignal before it bought Honeywell, which spun
off its TCAS-II to be produced by L-3 Comm, now in partnership with
Thales. The other producer is Rockwell Collins.
A TCAS or ACAS installation has a radio transmitter and receiver,
directional antennas, computer and cockpit display. TCAS, like secondary
surveillance radars on the ground, sends out an interrogationto which
transponders within range respond. The TCAS computer uses the time
between an interrogation and reply to calculate the distance.
Directional antennas give the bearing for the cockpit display, but the
collision algorithm is based on range rate--a constant change in range
(like a steady bearing) means that a collision will occur. The
transponder's Mode C or Mode S response gives altitude directly, which
is displayed as "+02" if the other aircraft is 200 ft. higher, or "-14"
if 1,400 ft. below. Climbs or descents at rates greater than 500 fpm.
are indicated by an arrow pointing in the appropriate direction.
STILL, THE ISSUE of controllers not knowing what TCAS
directions are being given, and the possibility of conflict, is
important. In the U.S., the directions are clear--obey TCAS. Even the
"general prudential" rule that instructions from air traffic controllers
are always to be obeyed unless an aircraft is in extremis would indicate
following TCAS. The logic would be that by the time a TCAS alert is
received, the ATC system has somehow failed to provide safe separation,
and so the aircraft is in extreme danger. TCAS information on the other
aircraft's proximity is updated one and perhaps two times a second,
compared with the controllers' information, which is updated at the
12-sec. interval of a secondary surveillance radar antenna's rotation.
Staggs said trials to data-link TCAS resolution advisories to
controllers have been held in Boston. Europe is working to mandate
delivery of TAs and RAs to controllers over the Mode S transponder, but
he points out that Mode S is an inefficient modem by modern standards,
with a data exchange rate of 300 baud, so messages would have to be
carefully designed.
© July 15, 2002 The McGraw-Hill
Companies Inc.

|