Aircrews from Marine Tilt Rotor Test and
Evaluation Squadron 22 (VMX-22) recently
completed shipboard landing qualifications on an
amphibious assault ship, operated in Iraqi-like
desert conditions in Nevada and gave orientation
flights to scores of the ground Marines the
Osprey is intended to carry into combat.
Those are
part of the preparations for the rigorous
operational test and evaluation trials the
squadron will go through starting in February,
said Capt. Marisol Zammit, public affairs
officer for the unit at Marine Corps Air Station
New River, NC.
The preparations for the operational tests
bring the Osprey program back to where it was in
December 2000 when all the aircraft were
grounded following a crash in North Carolina
that killed four Marines. An April 2000 crash in
Arizona had killed 19 Marines, including 15 from
Camp Pendleton. An accident years earlier in
Virginia had claimed seven lives.
Subsequent investigations by accident boards
and a blue ribbon commission of aviation experts
revealed a stunning history of design and
manufacturing shortcuts by the construction team
of Bell Helicopter and Boeing and multiple key
test flights skipped by cash-short Marine
officials.
But the commission found that the potential
capabilities of the unusual aircraft warranted
another chance.
The V-22 has been the Marines' top aviation
priority for more than 20 years. The Marines
hope to buy 360 MV-22s to replace the
Vietnam-vintage CH-46 helicopters, which are
their primary troop transports but are
increasingly difficult to maintain.
What has kept the Osprey alive through
decades of turmoil and tragedy is the promise of
a quantum leap in performance over any current
or planned helicopter.
The V-22's two jet engines and propellers can
rotate from a horizontal to a vertical position,
which allows it to take off and land like a
helicopter but to fly twice as fast and four
times as far as a chopper.
That means the Marines could launch an
airborne assault from ships farther off shore
and thus less vulnerable to enemy defenses. Or
they could stage raids 400 miles inland, as they
did with CH-53Es in Afghanistan, quicker and
without refueling.
That speed and range also appeal to the Air
Force Special Operations Command, which wants to
buy 50 Ospreys to replace the helicopters it
uses to carry commandos on their dangerous
missions. In an effort to show that the Osprey
can deliver its promised capabilities safely,
the aircraft resumed flying in May 2002, but
only in the hands of the skilled Marine and
Bell-Boeing test pilots at the Naval Flight Test
Center, Patuxent River, MD.
In a cautious flight test program, the test
pilots and engineers have filled in the blanks
in their knowledge of the Osprey's flight
characteristics, including its performance in
the rapid descent at slow speed conditions that
caused the Arizona crash. They also have worked
the bugs out of the plane's complex computer
software and tested the long-overdue redesign of
the V-22's leak-prone hydraulic system.
After more than 2,000 hours of accident-free
flying, the test program is beginning to phase
out, as VMX-22 uses the improved MV-22s and the
vastly expanded performance data to train new
crews in preparation for the operational
evaluation.
Those carefully monitored trials will
determine if the V-22 can be declared ready for
operational use, including future combat.
Success would allow the Osprey training squadron
-VMMT-204 – to begin producing the aircrews and
maintenance personnel for the first combat-ready
Marine squadron.
Some future Osprey squadrons would be based
in the San Diego area, either at Camp Pendleton
or Miramar Marine Corps Air Station.
Despite the progress the program has made
since returning to flight, doubts still linger.
Former Pentagon testing official Phillip
Coyle notes that the program has yet to show
that multiple aircraft can operate together on
and off amphibious ships and in massed landings
ashore – the way it must operate in combat.
And despite Bell-Boeing promises to improve
manufacturing quality, Ospreys continue to
experience parts failure, including the
disintegration of an engine cooling fan that
forced an emergency shutdown earlier this year.
The manufacturers also are under pressure to
cut the cost per aircraft from the current price
of $73 million to $58 million – which still
would be twice the expected cost when
then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney tried to
cancel the V-22 program as too expensive, in the
late 1980s.