New Sept. 11 Report Cites Warnings to FAA About Hijackings
Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:58 PM ET
Printer Friendly | Email Article | Reprints | RSS    
 

 
Top News
S.Korea Shocked, Suspicious at N.Korea Nuclear Boast
UK's Charles to Marry His Lover Camilla
N.Y. Lawyer Stewart Convicted of Aiding Terrorism
By Deborah Charles

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. aviation officials failed to respond to dozens of warnings of a possible terrorist threat months before Sept. 11, 2001, according to a previously undisclosed report by the panel that probed the attacks.

The report, which was recently declassified and obtained by Reuters on Thursday, said federal aviation officials reviewed 52 intelligence reports between April 1, 2001, and Sept. 10, 2001, that warned about Osama bin Laden or al Qaeda.

Most of the intelligence summaries created by the Federal Aviation Administration's security branch dealt with overseas threats, the document said. It noted there was no evidence the FAA knew of a plot to hijack commercial planes in the United States to use as weapons.

"Nevertheless the FAA had indeed considered the possibility that terrorists would hijack a plane and use it as a weapon," said the August 2004 staff report, which gave more details on what the FAA knew than were included in the Sept 11 commission's overall report released in July.

The staff report, not officially released but censored and given to the National Archives, took the FAA to task for failing to take steps to deter the attacks. The report was first disclosed in The New York Times in Thursday's editions.

It said FAA officials had enough information to hold classified briefings between March 2001 and May 2001 at 19 of the busiest U.S. airports to warn of the danger of an attack, including bin Laden's threats against aviation.

'SUICIDE IN A SPECTACULAR EXPLOSION'

The agency also distributed an unclassified CD-ROM presentation to air carriers and airports citing the possibility terrorists might conduct suicide hijackings, but said "fortunately we have no indication that any group is currently thinking in that direction."

The CD-ROM briefings said a domestic hijacking would be difficult.

"We don't rule it out ... If however, the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable," the report cited the CD-ROM as saying.

Still, it concluded that aviation officials did not direct adequate resources or attention to the problem. At the time, it said, the FAA seemed more concerned about airport congestion, delays and safety than about security.

An FAA spokeswoman said the agency had been making improvements in aviation security prior to the attacks.

"Without specific information about means and methods, there was no way we could tailor the countermeasures specifically to deal with the threat that we learned about on Sept. 11," Laura Brown told Reuters.

Before Sept. 11, the airport security system was run by the airlines but overseen by the FAA.

After Sept. 11, the government ordered cockpit doors hardened, took over screening of passengers and bags at airports and coordinated "watch lists" among intelligence agencies of known or suspected terrorists.

The panel's account said prior to the attacks, aviation officials had a false sense of security because there had been no attack on U.S. soil and the threat seemed to be overseas.

"The fact that the civil aviation system seems to have been lulled into a false sense of security is striking not only because of what happened on 9/11 but also in light of the intelligence assessments, including those conducted by the FAA's own security branch, that raised alarms about the growing terrorist threat to civil aviation," the report said.

(additional reporting by JoAnne Allen and John Crawley)

from this link

to Security Menu