Shoulder-Fired Missiles

The coming terror


Hand-held terror
Shoulder-launched missiles are cheap, portable and deadly against lumbering commercial jets -- and terrorists in the U.S. may already have them.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Paul J. Caffera

Nov. 5, 2001 | American Airlines Flight 970 was supposed to be routine, a two-hour hop from Managua, Nicaragua, to Miami International Airport. The only thing different about the scheduled flight leaving from Augusto Cesar Sandino International Airport on March 31, 1993, was that it was carrying senior-level Nicaraguan diplomats. Just before the plane was to take off, airport authorities received an anonymous telephone call threatening to shoot down the Boeing 727 with a shoulder-launched missile.

The plane was kept on the ground until security crews could sweep the area by foot and helicopter for any suspicious activity. The authorities had plenty of reason for concern -- the caller had said the plane would be shot down with a "Redeye" missile. Redeyes, the first American-made, shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles, had been captured by the Russians at the end of the Vietnam War and subsequently shipped to the Cubans, who then funneled them to Nicaragua's communist Sandinista regime.

In the end, the flight took off without incident, but the incident unnerved airport authorities and American Airlines, who realized that they were virtually powerless against the invisible threat. It also showed how close to home the threat of shoulder-launched missile attacks against passenger jets has come.

In the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, aviation experts warn that shoulder-launched antiaircraft missiles could be used against American passenger jets in the future. Terrorist organizations like Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network are already believed to own such missiles, and some say it will only be a matter of time before they filter into the U.S. -- if they haven't already.

So-called Man-Portable Air Defense Systems, or MANPADS, are capable of knocking a jet out of the sky from as far as five miles away and at an altitude of up to 13,000 feet in as little as 13 seconds. Those aboard often have no warning before the missile explodes as it slams into an engine, air-conditioning unit or other heat-producing device on the aircraft.

from this link
 

IASA commentary

A list ( http://aviation-safety.net/events/sed.shtml ) of airliner shoot-downs from all causes doesn't come close to 900 fatalities once you eliminate military actions (sic) like Korean, Libyan and Iranair. Most of those downed by surface-to-air missiles were by SAM-7s, not MANPADs.

Blowpipe (& it's successors- Javelin etc) were not IR homing so it was all aspect (?) and designed more for slower targets rather than fast crossing jets. So an airliner would be a decent target esp. if landing / taking off. Didn't the Soviets suffer badly with Stingers being launched at troop carrying aircraft departing / arriving at Kabul?

And if the missiles only blow off an engine then they'd still be very effective weapons. ie if they don't hit directly, the fragmentation warhead will, but big chunks of hot metal through the structure hitting a bunch of vital and flammable parts....

Anyone remotely involved in air transport security has been aware of this possibility for a very long time. The fact that this reporter (and Sec. Mineta it seems) never thought of it before doesn't make it news. It's just the latest scare-of-the-week from US authorities.

 

 

to Security Menu